I am also pleased that the noise level has abated with the reduction in repetition of the same issues. My tendency is to concentrate upon the science and that should become more common now.
For a while I was seriously considering leaving the group just to reduce the influx of messages that piled into my in-box, but now I am happy that I hung in there. The secret identity of MY is not important to me , but personally I think it is cowardly to hide in that manner and the collective frowns upon that behavior. Perhaps anyone who hides their identity should be banned as a general rule. Back to the science! Dave -----Original Message----- From: Randy Wuller <rwul...@freeark.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Jan 29, 2012 1:03 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:A huge Rossi (bad) thing to be revealed soon. (Daniele Passerini) I agree, this weekend's diversion regarding Maryyugo's secret identity is just lightly less irratating then last weekends free for all. Why can't the Vortex et back to real science. Ransom Sent from my iPhone On Jan 28, 2012, at 11:58 PM, Kyle Mcallister <kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- On Sat, 1/28/12, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > As the one who 'rode her ass' a number of times, I have said > that her (his) > technical criticisms were WELCOME... but to lay off the > focus on the > personalities. Good idea. Discussing the science and analysis of the tests is what we should e talking about. Except that you and others are now doing exactly what you say she was banned or. Focusing on the personal nature/personalities. Why don't you do as you uggested before, drop this garbage, and let us get back to the real heart of he matter, the technology (whatever it is) itself? But it's a much different taste when the tables are turned, isn't it? You (not ust you personally, Mark, a bunch of you) really didn't like what Mary had to ay, and it pissed you off so much you just can't drop it. You have to dig it ack up and keep going with it. The desire for the last word, the last insult, s just too much. And who can blame you? No one. You're only human, after all, nd just as fallible as any of the skeptics you so despise. Meanwhile, the rest of us are all hoping, or praying, whatever the case may e, for a truly revolutionary thing that gives us essentially free (or at least ar cheaper) heat during the winter, or clean water. > She ignored all suggestions and continued > with the barrage of > postings... She (he) deserved to be banned, and this > forum is much better > off and more functional without her (his) presence. Yes, by my count things have drastically improved. In the last 24 hours, only little greater than 50% of postings to Vortex-L have had to do with Mary's dentity and motivations. Yes, indeed, this is grand progress. Good work, entlemen, pat yourselves on the back. Three posts of the many in this thread have to do with the original topic. The est have to do with the Mary legacy. Think about that. And maybe, just maybe, drop this garbage, and let's get back o the fun stuff that Vortex used to be about. --Kyle
