Great news, and quite embarrassing for some. Ni-H could arguably to be different enough from the original 1989 experiment to convince the public that it's new. If JET is indeed demonstrating reliable 10x gains with palladium, the question of past suppression is difficult to ignore. What the field needs is an MIT press release. It would be a great way for MIT to rise above its difficult past. And, to be honest, it would lend great credulity to the claim. It's unlikely any mainstream news organizations will take the story seriously if the quoted source is a dedicated cold-fusion website.
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:00:39 -0500 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. \"openly\" demonstrated at MIT Hi Robert, I just got an update: the NANOR used in the present ongoing MIT Demonstration is a ZrO2-PdD CF/LANR solid state quantum electronic device. http://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/successful-cold-fusionlanr-demonstration-at-mit-again/ (Sorry I didn't post this on Vortex. I get the digest, and can't reply to specific messages by getting the digest.) Yours, Ruby
