Oops! Jones corrected my error where I said...
"and the three charged leptons (i.e., electron, muon and tau) each have integer spin." I meant to say *half-integer spin*... Thx Jones! -Mark From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 9:26 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Clues... Food for thought... I'm looking at wikipedia's "List of elementary particles" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_particles and all Quarks and Leptons have an opposite (anti<whatever>)... and the three charged leptons (i.e., electron, muon and tau) each have integer spin. I would argue, and this fits perfectly with my qualitative physical model, that as far as the leptons as concerned, the elementary 'particles' (e.g., electron and antielectron (positron)) are simply the two opposites of a dipolar oscillation; and likewise for the muon and tau leptons and their anti-particles... The oscillations are occurring so fast that we cannot, as of this date, distinguish the frequency of the oscillation, and thus, we PERCIEVE them to be separate entities. The more I delve into the details, the more I see agreement with the physical model which has been built up over the years... Enjoy the SuperBowl commercials! They're not nearly as good as they used to be... -Mark
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>