Incorrect address on first sending, now resent Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
For years I was deluded on the subject since I wouldn't let the results speak for themselves. It took at least a year before I was able to control the runaway chain reaction. I see here that my results are out of context with what is seen on the video, but will still make comment. I did many studies, and are still involved with car alternator 3 phase circuits driven between 465 and 480 hz, where I first commenced research. At first I wondered over ten years ago, where this is probably archived on my teslafy yahoo group; whether we could use the pre-existant alternator output before the field is energized (erroneously assumed by the scientific community to be due to remanent magnetism of the field rotor) whether that output could be rectified and sent back to the field to actually energize the field in a self feedback loop. In my first experiments I concluded that it didn't work, and then later I realized why it initially didnt appear to work. About a year or so later I re-performed the experiment and was astounded by the observation, which was a runaway chain reaction made by the feedback loop, where as I have noted took another year or so where I was able to use water to control the chain reaction, as amuzing as that sounds. I was then able to control the output of this self regulated machine by simply immersing electrodes into the water for the lowest output, or raising the plates out of the water for higher output. Believe it or not, the field has a non-linear resistance, like water. But this nonlinear behavior only exists at the lowest levels of field excitation. This means at the lowest levels of DC amperage conduction to the field, it acts as a much higher resistance then its actual resistive value. In reality the revolving "electromagnetic" field must first equal or match the pre-existant "rotational" magnetic field before it begins to add further to the voltage and amperage load effects seen on the stator output. Generally speaking the voltage on the stator output for the unenergized field case is not high enough to cross the barrier presented by the non linear field resistance. Additionally we have to rely on diodes to convert the AC stator output back into DC for feedback loop back to the field. So when we test that circuit, at first it doesnt seem to work,(at the tested rpm). So the first time I tested it, it didnt work. But the second time I tested it, I left the connections of the feedback loop on for about 30 seconds, AND IT DID WORK, BUT IT RAN AS A RUNAWAY CHAIN REACTION ALMOST IMMEDIATELY THAT STARTED GROANING THE ALTERNATOR AS IT WAS FUNCTIONING IN OVERLOAD CONDITION AND WOULD QUICKLY OVERHEAT AND BURN ITSELF UP. Yep I had created my own electrical frankenstein monster that for a year or so could not be controlled until the mechanisms for controlling it were learned. But what happened was that after thousands of cycles the voltage would gradually build up until it crossed the non-linear field resistance barrier and then once the effect took place it became a runaway self feedback loop. Yes technically machines that power their own source can be built, but the subsidiary problems to control the chain reaction will be self evident. I was actually thinking that I could apply for a patent on this form of regulation that I developed, and actually with the current circuits that I am working with, this could be tried in a different manner then before, but again the chief danger in those tests is the mentioned runaway circuit conditions, meaning that you just don't walk out of the room and come back with those things because when things go overload you need to shut things down right away. This actually happened to me in one instance where I used an overload output circuit that accidentally went open circuit and caused the machine to start outputing excessive voltages. In answer to your question then in this alternator context, yes a rotation can be used to charge itself, but there are complications involved with the applications. To show what can actually be done with resonant alternator circuits the following video shows the unergized field being used to light a 500 volt neon bulb, but I have dropped all experimentations involved with instituting that mentioned field self feedback loop. It is not enough to merely have a high voltage to use in the feedback loop, the circuit must also be able to supply the neccessary amperage for the fields usages. But amazingly in the shown circuit using the flux capacitor principle it acts as a "magnifier" in that when the neon load is removed, more vibration of amperage ensues then what the equal size inductor that caused its vibration to begin with has. I noted this on one of my videos, perhaps I can find that item shown by actual experimentation and repost it to vortex. I will end with the following question that will show the great mistake made in the following video...<br>HDN's Time Distortion Theory: The added influence of the air core vector made by<br>Lenz law at 1/6 cycle separation causes that component to rotate faster on the<br>phase rotation then does the ordinary phase rotation established by the line<br>connections. This component of continual advancement of the phase rotation cycle<br>after cycle "SEPARATES" itself from the ordinary phase rotation made by the line<br>connections themselves. However the symmetry of when it opposes the line voltage<br>and when it aids that line voltage by rotation does not hold true, and a longer<br>time period is found in that rotation when the new slightly higher frequency<br>rotating vector aids the voltages normally exhibiting the line voltage, compared<br>to when it opposes the line voltage. The net result is that more voltage appears<br>on the interphasal outputs then can be accounted for by the sum of its<br>components vector wise, and we state from those results that time reference<br>points of voltage<br>appearance in time itself has been expanded. This in turn implies that time<br>itself has been converted to voltage rise, and the next step then becomes<br>demonstrating this with real ohmic loads rather then mere noble gas discharges.<br><a href="http://youtu.be/USLqK59o-ec"; target="_blank">http://youtu.be/USLqK59o-ec</a><br><br>The grand mistake that I made in this video is contained in the following question, which when realized will show why my assumptions made in the video were false. I think I will put this one an yahoo question and answer....<br><br>In 24 hours from start to finish, how many times on a clock does the minute hand cross the hour hand. Get your thinking caps on for that one. I will now try to locate the video evidence for a magnifier action, where a smaller vibration causes a larger vibration to be imparted on the ending part, something along the lines of this enquiree here and also generally assumed to be impossible. I remember that it was just after this above video was made, somewhere in my four video demonstration. I will look for this on you tube and post back...
