Yes it is a bit unusual, as Wlad's paper are too.
Peter

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Robert Leguillon <
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> As It stands right now, no money is actually tied to these "preorders."
> I'm sure that in A.R's world, they serve to legitimize his claims. For a
> potential investor, it would be requiring to hear that he has already
> received 100,000 firm commitments (and actually sold fourteen 1MW plants!).
> As one of the sillier examples of his preorder method, let's take Wladimir
> as an example:
>
> Wladimir Guglinski February 8th, 2012 at 2:59 AM
>
> Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi
>
> May I pre-order 1000 eCats? Firstly I will ask to send me 5 eCats. After
> selling them, I will ask more 10, and after selling them more 20… more 40…
> etc.
>
> Regarded Wlad
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:58:31 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:100000 e-cats preordered
> From: peter.gl...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
>
> What, exactly, do mean > 100,000 orders for
> a product that is not still on the market?
> Is this a proof of the products value and performances? The workld market
> for such a product is in the range of hundreds of millions.
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Andre Blum <andre_vor...@blums.nl> wrote:
>
>  I was thinking:
>
> As a good example, the ecatnews.com headline reads: "Andrea Rossi: Almost
> 100,000 Domestic eCat Orders".
>
> How many of you have (subconsciously?) read this as "domestic orders for
> an eCat" instead of "orders for a domestic eCat"? And how many of you have
> assumed for other reasons that this preorder list was limited to
> individuals? In fact I think it is not limited to that in any way.
>
> If I were Rossi I'd carry a notebook and jot down everyone with a big
> mouth : individuals, small business owners, large business representitives,
> for the numbers they are even half-jokingly mentioning.
>
> And why not? In the end all these "orders", including my own (which I put
> in on the first day the list was opened, when it was priced substantially
> higher than it is now), are subject to that one conditional: the device
> should work. If *he* knows it works, he knows the condition is met, and
> there is no real reason not to accept these words as a preorder, even if
> the one who said it was not convinced himself at the time.
>
> Andre
>
>
> On 02/10/2012 08:38 AM, zer tte wrote:
>
>  http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=46#comment-182601
>
>  replying to someone asking how many e-cats where pre ordered already,
> rossi made the following comment :
>
> "about 100,000"
>
>  As the pre order announce occurred about 81 days ago this gives us about
> 1234 pre orders everyday, well i guess rossi's mailbox must be pretty
> crowded these days and i think the assistant sorting out all those orders
> every day really deserves our gratitude for doing such an insane job. So
> how many of these ordered 10+ units ? everyone ? this still makes at least
> 123 orders to sort everyday, 100 ? we go down to 12 orders per day, seems
> more manageable, but anyway something seems a bit off with these numbers.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to