---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:56 PM Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Rydberg question from Francis To: "Roarty, Francis X" <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
I base my ideas primarily on the work of Leif Holmlid, Heinrich Hora, George Miley, and Xiaoling Yang. See: http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MileyClusterRydbLPBsing.pdf Quoted as follows: *Ultrahigh-density deuterium of Rydberg matter clusters for inertial confinement fusion targets* *Rydberg matter was predicted and measured in gases where a static clustering of protons or deuterons to comparably high densities is generated with number densities up to 10^^23 cm-3 (Badiei et al. 2006). In contrast to gases, the appearance of ultra-high density clusters in crystal defects in solids were observed in several experiments where such configurations of very high density hydrogen states could be detected from SQUID measurements of magnetic response and conductivity (Lipson et al. 2005) indicating as special state with superconducting properties. These high density clusters have a long life time and with deuterons and – in contrast to protons – as being bosons which should be in a state of Bose-Einstein-Condensation (BEC) at room temperature (Miley et al. 2009,2009a).* I differ from Miley et al in that I see the formation of a Bose-Einstein-Condensation (BEC) at high temperatures comprising cooper pairs of protons as I have discussed in other threads here at Vortex. Since this data is derived from the experiments of eminent researchers using state of the art research equipment I deem it to be highly reliable and definitive. What is speculative is the formation of a BEC throughout and global to the entire mass of the micro powder. The difference between what Miley thinks and what I believe myself is as follows: I understand that the protons form cooper pairs of protons and Miley thinks they form inverse Rydberg matter. I think Rydberg atoms are the mechanism that enables nickel to ionize hydrogen using very little surface patch charge stimulation directed through the mediation of nickel’s polycrystalline structure. The Rydberg atom is 99.7 percent there to ionization and it does not take much to push these highly excited atoms over the top toward complete ionization into the proton state. The internal heater and the secret sauce does almost all of the hard ionization work. I believe that Rydberg matter in the hydrogen envelope just causes problems including quiescence. In the same way that Rossi has moved his reactor design forward over recent months, I have moved my ideas and understanding about his reaction substantially to this current stage and reserve the right to move them even further in the future as evidence is presented or uncovered. I see criticism as an aid to concept formation so feel free to have at me. Best Regards: Axil On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Hi Axil,**** > > You have a reasonable theory but we will always have some small > disagreements based on a fundamental difference in perspective which is > what led to my questions. We both agree that both Rydberg and inverse > Rydberg atoms are involved but I think the micro cavities initiate the > plasma with inverse Rydberg atoms that create a plasma which flows out into > the lattice and gives rise to Rydberg atoms while you feel the plasma > initiates in the lattice and then creates smaller Rydberg atoms that filter > down into the micro cavities. **** > > ** ** > > You are positing a catalytic poison which would result in an ash or > coating that either changes the conductive property or the quantum geometry > of the lattice and micro cavities while I am convinced that only heat is > necessary. IMHO the molten metal will relieve the suppression by growing > shorts across the geometry or closing the micro cavities entirely using > only the original Ni which grows plastic hot allowing the separated plates > to stretch toward each other or grow whiskers. I Agree that you might form > some odd Ni hydrides like those claimed by RM but I think it is more about > the geometry that allows them to form and that if milled to eliminate the > geometry and reheated the hydride would break down rapidly.**** > > ** ** > > For me the initiating energy source was uncovered with Jan Naudts’ paper > proposing the hydrino as relativistic. Recent papers on BLP now refer to > the hydrino as fractional Rydberg hydrogen but**** > > This is not the same as hydrinos being ejected from the suns corona at > near luminal speed. Relativistic hydrogen in micro cavities is due to > “equivalent” motion but rather than the gravitational acceleration and > slow gradients we assume at the macro scale negative acceleration has VERY > rapid change in rate. Normally we only expect to see breaks in > gravitational isotropy at the level of quantum foam below the Planck scale > but cavity QED allows these breaks to seep into the nano scale via Casimir > geometry. The motion of hydrogen relative to the tapestry of different > geometry in the cavity makes for constant breaks or rapid changes in > geometry which is a dynamic form of equivalent acceleration called “jerk”. > IMHO it is this jerk that applies an asymmetrical treatment to molecules vs > atoms and provides an alternative to the Maxwellian demon using molecular > disassociation as the organizing agent. It sidesteps the issue with trying > to organize chaotic motion and instead harnesses it as a power source to > discount the disassociation threshold for molecules while having no effect > on atoms. There is still a need to organize these discounts relative to any > opportunistic resonances but the environment is already there. **** > > ** ** > > The other reason I agree that both Rydberg and Inverse Rydberg atoms are > being created is a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect that the > Naudts paper led me to. Basically if the hydrino is relativistic and > experiencing equivalent accelerations in the micro cavities it must be the > cavities affording the effect not the hydrogen. To that end you can’t get > something for nothing and therefore the compression of the virtual > wavelengths inside the cavity must be balanced by stretching of the > virtual waveforms outside the cavity. This posit is supported by claims of > changes in radioactive half lives for gases loaded into metal lattices. > There are claims for rapid acceleration as well as some claims of minor > delays which would suggest a shallow region of stretching all around the > cavity exterior while the cavity is a concentrated region of very rapid > compression. **** > > ** ** > > Fran**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, February 10, 2012 12:15 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Rydberg question from Francis**** > > ** ** > > Your theory has a lot of good points but I think one of us has a > misconception about Rydberg matter .. and it could be me so maybe we can > hash out a couple things right now and at least one of us will benefit.*** > * > > Sorry for the delay Francis.**** > > I’ll start with a the small bone to pick that I have mentioned previously > is that you keep mentioning Rydberg matter when I think you mean inverse > Rydberg matter if you are referencing the same hydrogen that others coin > hydrino….**** > > When I think and talk about Rydberg atoms and associated matter, this is > what I have in my mind. > > Rydberg matter/atoms as a phase of matter can be formed by many elements > including hydrogen. It is usually associated with one atom in the outer > most electron orbit. **** > > In the hydrogen envelope of an NiH reactor, there can be a mixture of > Rydberg matter and atom types witch include atoms of hydrogen, Rydberg > atoms of the catalyst (aka secret sauce), Rydberg matter of hydrogen, > Rydberg matter of the catalyst, and trace amounts of other elements formed > by transmutation and some from contamination.**** > > Furthermore, a compound molecule of Rydberg matter can be composed of a > mixture of hydrogen atoms and atoms of the catalyst.**** > > It is safe to assume that in the highly excited hydrogen envelope of a > long running NiH reactor complex multi-element reactions are forming many > and varied types and mixtures of Rydberg atoms and molecules.**** > > Also, in such an excited gas envelope, it is safe to assume that some of > these mixtures of Rydberg molecules will transform into the inverse type in > time. **** > > I think it is reasonable to assume that Rydberg atoms being far smaller > and more electrostatically nimble than the large molecule types will be > ionized by the micro-powder to protons that will accumulate inside the > micro-cavities.**** > > The large molecules especially containing atoms of the catalyst will not > usually be ripped apart because of their robust quantum mechanical > characteristics. This is just my intuition and needs to be verified by > experiment.**** > > If not absorbed into the micro-powder, these large and excited molecules > of all types will steal more Rydberg atoms from the envelope and grow even > bigger. They could grow big enough to clog up some growing percentage of > micro-cavities until the reaction stalls into quiescence.**** > > I believe that DGT found this type of molecule contaminate on the surface > of the spent Rossi ash thereby deducing what type of catalyst Rossi was > using as his secret sauce.**** > > It is this contaminant that DGT purges when they vacuum clean the > micro-powder.**** > > It is the buildup of this contaminant that kills the Rossi reaction in 8 > hours.**** > > The DGT pulse burn régime will tend to minimize the growth of large > Rydberg molecules thereby avoiding performance reduction by micro-cavity > congestion in a way that will happen during the Rossi continuous burn > régime.**** > > **** >
