BTW, Dick Smith is acting like a retarded. It seems he cannot understand
his own email exchanges, his own native language.

2012/2/18 Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>

> The worse part it is that  he considers a written communication (e-mail)
> better than a phone or skype video conference. I think he forgot that the
> latter can be easily recorded and hardly faked whereas the former can be
> easily forged. Go  figure.
>
>
> 2012/2/18 Andre Blum <andre_vor...@blums.nl>
>
>>
>> Judging from the latest thread at http://ecatnews.com/?p=2068, after
>> just a few days, Dick Smith already manages to irritate a lot of people at
>> ecatnews.com with his impatience and amateurism.
>>
>> His plan was clear: show me that it works, and I will give you $1M.
>> Defkalion accepts the offer, and they should be admired for doing so. But
>> instead of now allowing them to produce evidence, it looks like Smith will
>> continue his ranting about how much this looks like it is a scam.
>> Apparently he doesn't even have the patience to sit out his own show.
>>
>> What irritates me most, personally, is that, while he himself brought up
>> the necessity of having experts like Kullander and Essen present, he seems
>> to have forgotten about their relevance already, forgets to get them in the
>> loop and is now in personal negotiations with Defkalion about the test
>> plan, including calorimetry details, as if he were an expert.
>>
>> At this time, IMHO, Smith would do best in sitting back a bit, establish
>> contact with these experts he mentioned, or good alternatives, then agree
>> on a good schedule and give the other players some stage time.
>>
>> Initially I thought I envied Smith for coming up with a plan that would
>> make him come out as a winner no matter of the outcome of the
>> demonstration. But he is screwing up already by playing unfair, and now I
>> am not so certain he will come out undamaged.
>>
>> Andre
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com

Reply via email to