Hm if NI was working under an NDA they would use another choice of words
to deny a relationship with Rossi, I think, wouldn't they? Betts words
are pretty clear (if it is correct what Krivit states on NET) and do not
seem to leave much room for interpretation... Further as they explicitly
mention Leonardo Corporation in their 14th November press release, why
would they by now be working with a partner company of Leonardo Corp.?
Of course this might be possible but by now it seems as if you really
have to digg deep to find something that supports Rossi. Some weeks ago
this was the other way round...
For me personally, the NI statement was one of the main reasons to give
Rossi some credibility, but as this argument is gone now, I wonder whats
still there that speaks for Rossi?
Let's hope Defkalion's tests (starting next Friday) have more substance
and can really provide irrefutable evidence of LENR...
Wolf
Did Krivit ask if NI was working with any partner/customer/joint
venturer of Rossi/Leonardo Corp.
At this point if Rossi is legit he has to Partner with an entity with
resources.
Frankly, it would be just like Krivit not ask that question or tell if
he did.
Also, NI could be working under an NDA.
Ransom
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com
<mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/02/18/national-instruments-denies-relationship-with-rossi/
Confirmed by! NI.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
