I think here Mark did slip rather much, but in general Mark's writing is keeping the hopes up, where as 99,998 % of journalists has just ignored this thing.
Also Mark has written many very good articles, and he really does hope for better future. For example when he was interviewed, he showed his passion towards changing the world. His writing is not just clinical reporting, but he really does believe into ecat. Too bad that Rossi has behaved like lunatic and he should not deserve even that much attention what Mark has given to him. Mark has continued reporting even though he made the worst possible mistake that journalist can make, when he reported that National Instruments would be the Customer. This kind of spreading unconfirmed rumours is just unforgivable to any journalist. It should not be tolerated even for private self-respecting people or bloggers. —Jouni Sent from my iPad On 25 Feb 2012, at 02:29, "*** Craig Brown ***" <cr...@overunity.co> wrote: > Does anyone really expect to get a fair hearing on cold fusion from one of > the establishment and Rothschild owned lapdogs – Forbes? > This is what they do best. > > Good to see that the comments reflect the fact that Gibbs is out of touch > with 99% of the people reading his stoopid article. > > From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, 25 February 2012 9:05 AM > To: vortex-l > Subject: [Vo]:Mark Gibbs- Forbes..more Dan Smith s Dead Deal > > Greetings Vortex, > > On a date, Feb 24th, I thought that Mark Gibbs of Forbes "could" focus on the > upcoming Defkalion Test- > He draggggs out the Dead Dan Smith Deal..sheeeeesh. > http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/02/24/dick-smith-rossi-e-cat-too-fantastic-to-be-true/ > > Forbes....lets look at the hole in the doughnut. > > Respectfully, > Ron Kita, Chiralex > At one time--I thought Forbes ..just " might" give all sides..especially > MIT, Swartz and Hagelstein coverage on > Cold Fusion. Magazines..it is the advertisers..that wag the DOG. > > Respectfully, > Ron Kita, Chiralex
