IMHO Defkalion has told that they do not believe in simple theories. I have said the same starting with my "topology is the key"paper in 1992. Our colleague Daniel Rocha has said that LENR is something like photosynthesis. Not very encouraging, we still not know how photosynthesis works- in all its stages. Peter
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote: > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6674#p6674 > > DGT just answer some question on theories: > > could be translated as swiss neutrality, or secularity... they talk of > duality,and seems ti criticize position that exclude others... > > > Since the last 2 decades, several theories have been proposed to explain > LENR phenomena and "Huizenga's three questions: > Question #1: of how the Coulomb barrier is penetrated > Question #2: the lack of strong neutron emissions > Question #3: the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays > > A short summary of most of them is presented in alphabetic order in > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theorie > ... ndex.shtml<http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/Theories/TheoryIndex.shtml>. > This incomplete presentation includes: > > *Bazhutov-Vereshkov Theory* > ** > *Chubb (Scott) Theory* > ** > *Chubb ( Talbot) Theory* > ** > *Fisher Theory * > ** > *Gareev Theory* > ** > *Hagelstein Theory* > ** > *Hora-Miley Theory* > ** > *Kim-Zubarev Theory* > ** > *Kirkinskii-Novikov Theory* > ** > *Kozima Theory * > ** > *Li Theory * > ** > *Preparata Theory * > ** > *Sinha-Meulenberg Theory* > ** > *Storms Theory * > ** > *Szpak Theory* > ** > *Takahashi Theory* > ** > *Widom-Larsen Theory* > > whilst several other proposed theories are omitted from this list such as > (not included all): > > *Frank Znidarsic theory, * > ** > *Stoyan Sarg Sargoytchev/ M. Kanarev theory,* > ** > *Yeong E. Kim theory,* > ** > *Wladimir Guglinski/ C. Stremmenos theory,* > ** > *Y.T. Didenko/K. S. Suslick theory* > > etc > > All of the above proposed theories are base on the assumption that only > one type of reaction can occur in LENR: either those related with "strong > forces" or those related with "weak forces". In most cases, results of such > theories contradict with existing general theories or dogmas of present > incomplete models of theoretical physics. > > There is a strong possibility of a forthcoming "LENR theories war" between > the members of the existing small community of LENR/CF researchers > (possible conflicts closely related with government funding to be released > in the area). Such "war" could turn out to be a new "War of Religion", > similar to the 1562- 1598 war between the catholics (the strong force fans > in this case) and the protestants (the weak force fans), where all involved > parties will claim their "one faith" slogan against all the others. > > We are following the orthodox approach, which is not to get involved in > such conflicts, even though we already have a pretty good understanding on > what really is going on during all faces of what we have called as > a"dynamic multistage chemically assisted low energy nuclei reactions". Our > decision is to do our job, which is to provide to the market safe and > stable high performance products *and* to the scientific community with > all the hard evidence from LENR phenomena measured with new type of > specially designed instrumentation that we had to build to support our > product's R&D. > > As history of science and philosophy teaches us, when there is a conflict > because of "duality", in all cases the truth lies in their synthesis > (Plotinus- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plotinus ) > > Thank you > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
