I am getting the impression that the old timer LENR researchers are hung up on deuterium and Helium 4 ash as the only true path toward LENR success. Not true. Ni-H is the golden path ahead. You will find gold where others are finding it, not in your living room rug.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:52 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > George Miley and Xiaoling Yang have just published the abstract - > > "A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions > (LENRs)" > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf > > - which will be presented in the > "ADVANCED CONCEPTS: LENR, ANTI-MATTER, AND NEW PHYSICS" Session > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf > - Friday, March 23, 2012 > > at the NETS (Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space meeting) > The Woodlands, TX, March 21-23, 2012 > http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2012/NETS2012Home.html > > They briefly discuss pressure cycling to generate heat from Patterson-type > cells. Perhaps, someone living within driving distance of Houston could > attend, and ask for more details. Also, Yang's and Miley's email > addresses are on the abstract, in case anyone wants to contact them. > > > > What exactly do we mean by "reloading"? It can't be the same as initial > > loading where hydrogen seeps into the lattice to fill or displace any > > vacancies or ambient gas already present because once a stable average > > gradient is established you would simply have migration where any > > displacements leave behind a vacancy for other randomly moving hydrogen > to > > fill. This sounds much like a long ago argument I had with Jones Beene > > regarding the need to "circulate" hydrogen through the nano powder [based > > on the Haisch Moddel prototype], apparently circulation isn't needed at > > the macro scale because we aren't taking any energy away from the > hydrogen > > and it can be re-cycled endlessly just using the random motion of heated > > gas through the geometry. I can see where changing the "pressure" up and > > down might modify the degree that the hydrogen is able to seep into the > > lattice [fractional levels?] but you aren't circulating new gas.. or is > > this what you mean by "reloading" ? > > Fran > > From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] > > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:39 PM > > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]: DGT Triggered Reaction? Any Evidence? > > > > Thanks Terry, I recall DGT saying that as well. I was actually wondering > > if the reloading happens naturally as a result of the hydrogen pressure > > after a triggered event takes place. In this way, they are just re > > triggering an event that proceeds to completion on its own. Can hydrogen > > reload into nickel quickly enough for this type of reaction to be a > useful > > energy source and could we determine the amount of time between the > > triggered events from their scope display? Also, this process reminds me > > a great deal of the video produced by Blacklight showing a run at the > > university test facility where one triggered pulse of heat energy was > > observed. > > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com<mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com>> > > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> > > Sent: Thu, Mar 1, 2012 11:31 am > > Subject: Re: [Vo]: DGT Triggered Reaction? Any Evidence? > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:44 AM, David Roberson > > <dlrober...@aol.com<mailto:dlrober...@aol.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Does anyone within the vortex see additional evidence in support any of > >> the > > > >> above concepts? > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked PDGT specifically if they were reloading with hydrogen for the > > > > second burst and they denied that was the case. > > > > > > > > T > > > > > > > > >
