I'm interested, where do you share your design? link? > Guenter, the idea of an open source LENR project is worthwhile. I have > shared my design and will continue to share it in the hopes that it will
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Bastiaan, very informative and timely link. This was just what I was > looking for. > > 0.3 J per spark, means that at 300 hz, I am providing 90W of equivalent > resistive heating to the reactor. I believe this should be enough to heat > the reator to the necessary temperature to initiate the LENR effect. > > Guenter, the idea of an open source LENR project is worthwhile. I have > shared my design and will continue to share it in the hopes that it will > spur greater cooperation. My designs alway use "off the shelf" parts and > pipe fittings you can get from McMaster, Lowe's or Ebay, so they are low > cost. My entire setup including the vaccuum pump, the Data logging and all > (except supplies) is under $350. My reactor design is disposable, and cost > at the most $50 if using the best stainless steel fittings. I do not > believe there will be any economies of scale to be had with my design cause > they already use the cheapest parts. > > I think keeping it simple and low cost is one of the keys to successfully > replicating Rossi. > > I wish Bill will consider converting this list into a forum format so that > we can share attachments and other files. > > > > From: Bastiaan Bergman > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:To Spark or Not to Spark > > And a copy of the paper can be found here : > > http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/A-study-of-a-sparkdischarge-in-hydrogen-at-atmospheric-pressure.pdf > > > On Mar 12, 2012 5:11 AM, "Andre Blum" <andre_vor...@blums.nl> wrote: >> >> >> www.fusioncatalyst.org >> >> Andre >> >> On 03/11/2012 09:20 AM, Guenter Wildgruber wrote: >> >> hello guys, >> >> just an idea: >> Working together on an open source-LENR-device. >> There seems to be quite some knowledge here at vortex, and a couple of >> people seem to work in their backyard on their own devices. >> This is suboptimal. >> >> How about that: >> introduce some economy of scale: lets say ten devices, which need not be >> identical, but have a common base, e.g. nano-Nickel, a certain type of >> reaction chamber, hydrogen etc. >> the basic construction could be implemented via division of labour. >> one builds the basic reaction-chamber, the other procures the nano-Nickel, >> the third provides for some basic electronics, and so on. >> It does not make sense to procure nano-Nickel in every individual case. >> >> I'm thinking of about maybe ten devices, which share a common design, and >> can be freeley varied to optimize the effect. >> >> The overall concept seems to be straightforward enough, to make this a >> reasonable approach. >> It would have the consequence, that nobody can monopolize the technology >> via patents or secret sausages etc. >> >> Waiting for Godot in the form of Rossi or Defkalion otr Miles or McKubre >> is starting to go onto my nerves. >> >> What do You think? >> >> >> ________________________________ >> Von: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> >> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Gesendet: 11:14 Sonntag, 11.März 2012 >> Betreff: Re: [Vo]:To Spark or Not to Spark >> >> >> Awesome, Great minds think alike, eh? :-) >> >> Let us know how it goes. >> >> How are you driving your spark plug? I am planning a simple CDI >> Electronic Ignition Box for a CRRC-Pro 26cc engine: >> >> http://www.ebay.com/itm/130659127048 >> >> >> >> >
