On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>wrote:
In the peer-reviewed journals, though, the debate, for now, is over. Cold > fusion survived. What's dead is the highly skeptical position. > I'm grateful cold fusion research has survived. But it seems like the highly skeptical position is not yet dead, and the most well-regarded journals are still not publishing. On the message boards I hear the question, "where are there effects that are significantly above error reported in a well-regarded journal?" Maybe I've missed some recent developments? Eric
