Jojo Jaro wrote:
Robin,
Injecting hydrogen would necessarily complicate the reactor
setup. I suppose you would need a very precise injection,
filtering and recirculation system operating at extreme pressure
and temperature. This would greatly increase the cost of your
reactor without any guarantee of success. If you do not
recirculate the hydrogen, you would need to have fresh hydrogen
being pumped constantly. I believe that would be counter
productive as you would be replacing hydrogen Rydberg matter with
molecular hydrogen - the latter being unwanted.
Simply designing the reactor for turbulence (by
way of alternating magnetic field acting upon Fe powder
contained within) is a more
straightforward solution.
Jojo
----- Original Message ----- From: <mix...@bigpond.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ang.: [Vo]:Rydberg matter and the leptonic
monopol
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:19:42
+0800:
Hi,
[snip]
2. I don't believe bulk heating the powder
is the best way to create Rydberg matter. Bulk Heating it would
tend to concentrate too much heat on certain portions of the
clump and possibly melt it. At the least, the heat would
probably sinter the nickel powder and destroy all active nano
sites. Someone correct me, but if I remeber correctly, Nickel
atom migration and the start of the sintering process begins to
occur at around 500C. Clearly, with bulk heating, you can not
prevent heating a few protions of that the nickel powder clump
to 500C. The goal is to ionize the powder and hydrogen to
create Rydberg matter, not heat it and sinter it and melt it
with bulk heating.
If the Hydrogen is injected through a very small hole, then the
gas jet can be
directed at the Ni powder on the bottom, puffing it up, resulting
in constant
mixing, and ensuring that the temperature of both gas and powder
are constant.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
|
