Lou,
Show this to one of your non degree tech guys working at your transducer
based instrument factory shop in N. J. :
http://www.icpig2009.unam.mx/pdf/PB13-3.pdf
He could assemble it in an hour. Use Ar instead of He. Next day check
for He. Surprise!
The C deposit is conical nano structure and has a trapped H within. No
need to check for excess heat. Where there is He there is Rossi Fusion.
The ECat appropriated Chan one Hydride mix and must be changed every six
months because of He build up. His attempt to get patents on Hydride
fusion ran into prior pending obstacles. Hence the rush to cheap mass
production.
Warm Regards,
Reliable
pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd,
I intend to do some more research on this - plasmonics is pretty dicey.
I'm not sure whether a nanowire has a cross-section large enough to
scatter gammas originating at any significant distance, thoug, unless they
are extremely collimated.
But, I am more optimistic than you are that W-L would pass this test.
According to the calculations in the paper I cited, the enormous effective
(not relativistic) mass of those electrons make each look like a subatomic
battering ram to any particle unfortunate enough to collide with one.
I will try to find a local college with appropriate lab resources.
There's a slim chance I can get it done.
Probably expensive. Too bad I lost the lottery.
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 03:29 PM 4/5/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd,
Regarding the absence of gammas -
... is it reasonable to suppose that a high energy gamma would
experience many (anomalously high) dissipative Compton collisions before
escaping as a less energetic photon? If this is plausible, could we
confirm it, by embedding a few radioactive gamma sources inside nanowires
and observing whether gammas are attenuated and/or directionally
scattered
during current flow?
Gamma sources could be placed so that gammas pass through the
supposedly active heavy electron patches, and, if W-L theory is real,
drastic attenuation should be seen. That attentuation should not be
seen with controls. W-L theory requires 100% absorption of the gamma
energies that would be generated from neutron absorption, so this
should not be difficult to detect.
Since Larsen patented this, it's really on him to demonstrate it. I'm
not about to try setting up some complex experiment just to prove a
wild theory wrong.
Now, if I had a reason to believe W-L theory, if I were a proponent
of it, then, sure, the experiment would be very much in order.
Widom and Larsen are raising a highly unlikely theory *without any
experimental evidence specifically supporting it.*
If they published a gamma screen paper, with sufficient detail for
replication, and showing their own results, *then* we'd see some
movement on this. Until then, it's fancy pie in the sky.
That wouldn't prove W-L theory, but a successful prediction is golden
for moving ahead with new science.
