On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Michele, > > A very interesting approach. > The problem is to NOT confound AR's weaknesses with the > essence of his E-cat generator that has IMHO (and really, it seems) > increased with two orders of magnitude the energy > *density* and intensity compared with the nanometric Ni etc materials a > la Arata etc. > What do you think? > Peter > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Michele Comitini < > michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That blog is indeed cursed by a semi-sentient program that believes >> that its name is AR. >> >> While AR can be frustrating at times, when I want answers that make >> more sense and have deeper implication I use to talk the Emacs doctor >> (Eliza with a degree in psychotherapy): >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Total-Frustration.html >> >> As you can see from this example, more common sense is in the >> simulated dialogs: >> >> https://scalesoflibra.wordpress.com/2009/05/02/more-fun-with-eliza-the-emacs-psychotherapist/ >> >> mic >> >> 2012/5/2 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>: >> > Perfect;y possible, however immediacy is in the question >> > but not in the answer. With Rossi you never know. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Akira Shirakawa < >> shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2012-05-02 21:11, Peter Gluck wrote: >> >>> >> >>> A recent dialog of Andrea Rossi with one of his kibitzes >> >>> (only the relevant part): >> >>> >> >>> Do you plan to increase the COP in the near future? >> >> >> >> >> >> c) I think the keyword here is __near__ future. >> >> My take: planned obsolescence. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> S.A. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dr. Peter Gluck >> > Cluj, Romania >> > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
