But of course!.... who wouldn't want one? However, I want a vehicle that
can travel the stars w/o trouble or fail, detect a dust-sized particle a
million miles in advance, bring me back to life, or enable me with
immortality, and/or leave all other spacecraft in the dust... no 'ifs' 'ands'
or
'buts' about it.
The
problem is that it already exists, and is so very sophisticated that noone of
this time can recognize, perceive, and/or conceive of it. Something can
perform what we tend to consider phenomenal, extraordinary or unbelievable,
and/or hover motionless w/o a sound, tends to leave one only in disbelief,
confused, and maybe feeling abit downright BS'd.
> And second, who wants a car that has a mind
> of it's own, that can potentially determine that it doesn't like the way
> it's been treated lately, and decides to crash itself, thus ridding
itself
> of
> the owner?
>
*I* would want a car like this. As I pointed out in my book, for thousands
of years everyone had cars like this. They were called "horses." Horses
have minds of their own; they know the way home as well as you do; and they
are far more likely to shake you off and run away than any computer
controlled car will be. Orders of magnitude more likely. Some are downright
ornery.
See my book, chapter 17:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusiona.pdf
Note that Arthur Clarke made the point about horses before I did. He
thought of everything.
- Jed
>>
</HTML>
