My bad, Eric. 

And I need to set the record straight on this important detail - since
Randell Mills did find tritium - over twenty years ago - and before he
decided to distance himself from LENR ! 

Once again, America's Newton shoots himself in the foot ! Too bad.

Ed Storms, whose memory is much better than mine, reminds me of this
important detail - and it is from a rather famous article in Fusion
Technology : Mills & Kneizys, "Excess heat production by the electrolysis of
an aqueous potassium carbonate electrolyte and the implications for cold
fusion" Fusion Technology 20, 65 (1991)

Randy admits in print that they detected a significant amount of tritium but
not enough to explain the heat. The estimated amount is not clear. Tritium
measurement is easy, and it is so sensitive that very few atoms are required
to reveal much more than background, which then looks like a large amount,
and consequently it is hard to arrive at an accurate energy balance. But the
fact that this admission comes from Mills himself, is important in many
ways. And the lack of mention of nuclear reactions thereafter (after 1991)
is itself damning in retrospect as it will be interpreted as intent to
deceive. Lawyers should take note (this is for the other Randy).

This appearance of tritium from a light water reaction also bolsters Ed's
case for a (preliminary) round of deuterium forming reactions, which would
be needed to supply the required level of deuterium, so that statistically
we do not depend on the natural paucity ... but it also leaves the
Thermacore story (apparent null result) unexplainable, and even more
mysterious.
 
In the end, there is little doubt than QM tunneling provides a mechanism for
some amount of tritium to show up with light water alone. Since 3H is so
easy to measure with certainty, due to its short half-life and known beta
decay spectrum - even a few atoms are not be easily hidden. But it gets more
complicated from there on.

The next question is how much energy is really carried away by the neutrino,
when hydrogen fuses into deuterium, or is there another route ? Can the net
thermal gain be explained without "redundant ground states" or is that too
part of the setup for allowing lots of hydrogen to fuse into deuterium?

It just gets curiouser and curiouser...

Jones

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to