At 12:19 PM 5/26/2012, Harvey Norris wrote:
64 views before announcement...
beforeitsnews.com/story/2177/069/Localized_time-_space_curvature_demonstrated_from_3_phase_alternator_powered_666_machine.html
This measurement showed in the video is the most important
measurement ever made regarding relativity, besides that of the
eclipse of the sun verifying Einstein's concepts. It furthermore
shows that it is not necessary to make astronomical measurements to
show the principles involved with relativity, and that machines
exhibiting a "localized" time space curvature are indeed possible.
Topological Evidence of Time Distortion in the 666 Machine
youtu.be/uakJJKGf-mM
Biography: Founder of Tesla Research Group
nventor of the 666 machine, a special torsional device that can
either expand or compress the time periods acting between the three
phases of a three phase power source. This utilyses a higher
dimensional vector expressed in the 3D space, whereas the vectors of
ordinary three phase machines will show their resultant voltages
plotted as vectors in time as a 2D flat diagram. 3 dimensional
representation of voltage vectors in time are necessary to show the
results of the 666 machine's operation. If we try to represent them
in the conventional manner employed with a 2D vector diagram; we
wind up with the quandary of a 3rd resultant vector solution
appearing to exist as two different vectors on that 2D vector
diagram. By cutting out the piece of pie between these two vector
solutions: and then folding the entire diagram into a 3D cone shape
by connecting the two solutions into a single solution; we now have
a 3D vector system to show the actions of the
machine by its plotted vectors. [...etc.]
I'm going to point out the obvious that often doesn't get pointed
out. Harvey, if you don't realize how insane you will seem, with what
you write, by most of us, you don't understand enough about other
people to successfully communicate with them.
So what are you attempting to accomplish?
None of this means you are "wrong." It does probably mean that
whether or not you are right or wrong is irrelevant, it won't make
any difference at all.
Now, I'm going to suggest a bypass, a way that if you should actually
be "right," could get around the communication barrier. If you can
convince *one other person*, who is knowledgeable and cogent, that
your work is worth looking at, who will represent it to others, you
will have made a major step forward. If you can't do this, though,
the most I could suggest is that you write it down, maybe it will be
discovered by future generations. If you want to see results in your
lifetime, you'll need to do something much more than write as you
have been writing.
And it's far more likely -- just my personal impression -- that you
don't actually know what you are doing. But I'm not inspired to
follow you enough to find out either where you are right or where you
are wrong.
