The appearance of tritium in Ni-H reactions may (or may not) depend on a
prior population of deuterium. Most likely it does, but we would be remiss
if we did not mention alternatives.

There are other known and novel routes to tritium which do not depend on a
threshold level of D ... and 'conservation of miracles' might favor one of
these novel hypotheses :-) In any event, the following speculative
hypothesis is falsifiable; and that is all that anyone can ask for, at this
stage.

This route would involve so-called "halo nuclei", specifically a known
species of the halo phenomenon: 6He. But in this case, the "neutrons" are
virtual and derive from Rydberg hydrogen (or in Mills' vocabulary, from
dihydrinos). Here is a page describing the Helium 6 halo:

http://www.rogerarm.freeuk.com/Pages/HaloNuclei.htm

On decay from the halo state, a small percentage of these atoms would be
expected to be tritium, which is easily detectable. 

With two-neutrons, the probability of forming 6He as a halo nucleus is
hindered by both separation energy and angular momentum, which would be more
favorable with two neutral hydrinos, due to significantly lower mass. IOW -
as to appraising the QM probability of this nucleus ever forming to being
with - the configuration of the two extra neutrons creates a large
centrifugal barrier, favoring the much less massive but equally neutral
hydrino species.

The falsifiable part involves any of the prior experimental Ni-H setups
where tritium is expected. There are more than a dozen papers on the LENR
site where this is seen. The usual reactants would be nickel and potassium
carbonate.

The strategy (for falsifiability) to test the 4H or "hydrino helium halo
hypothesis" is to compare a mix of hydrogen and helium as the gas fill,
instead of hydrogen only, in a two experiment which are otherwise identical.

If significantly more tritium is seen with the mix of hydrogen and helium,
compared with hydrogen alone - all else being equal, then we have made a
prima facie case for the validity of the hypothesis.

Jones 

 

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to