What happens if you assume a frame of reference that is at the same velocity as the moving electrons? No relative motion exists under that condition to allow coupling.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Jun 10, 2012 1:52 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ed Storms' new Theory/Model On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:59 AM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > Surface plasmons provide good examples of coherent charge currents. The electric field can also provide analogous coupling. A mechanical analog - One uncoupled freight train car traveling 50 km/h cannot climb a 10m hill - but the lead car coupled to 100 others moving at 50 km/h can easily Nice analogy. > I believe that collisions involving many coherently moving charges cannot be reduced to high energy collisions involving single charged particles. I do like Storms's approach. I wonder whether the surface cracks serve as notch antennas which can focus incident fields many thousands of times. The fields must be focused millions of times according to Ed. he tracks keep the train of cars "rigid" otherwise a small bump would ake the lead car veer off course. o either you need tracks or a smooth terrain. harry
