Sorry Michael, but judging someone simply based on their choice of words, especially with the global connectivity of the internet where the person's English might be limited, is a very poor way to determine validity of the person's ideas... you certainly can do so, but I prefer not to.
Perhaps you don't have the scientific/mathematical expertise to judge them on the merits of the published paper??? Have you at least read it? -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Michael Foster [mailto:mf...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 3:32 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: Theorem unifies superfluids and other weird materials... One presumes they mean hypothesis or perhaps theory. The term "theorem" does not apply this idea. An attempt at such pedantic erroneous usage usually qualifies the proponent as a fool. --- On Mon, 6/11/12, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> > Subject: [Vo]:FYI: Theorem unifies superfluids and other weird materials... > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Date: Monday, June 11, 2012, 11:43 PM > "Theorem unifies superfluids and > other weird materials" > > > > http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2012/06/08/theorem-unifies-superfluids- > and-ot > her-weird-materials/ > > > > Don't know if Storms' NAE qualifies for 'weird materials', but I'd bet > it does... > > > > -mark > > > > > >
