As a preface, it is not known what kind of nanotubes Vu1 is using. If they are using SWNT, then the electrons will be entangled and coherent. I have not looked at the patent is detail, but I doubt that this sort of detail will be provided by Au1.
In any case. their nanotubes will be well made and uniform whatever they are. The hydrogen envelop also complicates the situation because the bulb operates in a vacuum. There is a class of devices that operate through electron field emission. This produce is one of them. Indeed, CNTs are characterized by high emission electronic properties due to their good electron conductivity and a specific one dimensional geometry, resulting in a drastic amplification of the electrical field strength in the vicinity of the nanotube tip. The goal is to develop a high electric field around the nickel powder. I don’t know yet how that can be done in detail. Reduce the anode bias. Then place nano-powder on the cathode emitter itself; right on top of these tips? On the plus side they have dimmer capability which means that the emissionfield is variable. I will work on it. On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ** > Axil, the way I understand it from your posts is that: the 1-dimensional > nanotube would capture electrons in the plasma that will then accumulate > charge that will screen the coulomb barrier on any atom that may happen to > be nearby. When coulomb barrier is screened, fusion occurs, or fission > occurs due to the destablilizing effect of the absorbed electron, proton or > neutron. > > If I understood this correctly, how does spraying a nickel nano-powder > coated surface with electrons induce this kind of LENR reaction, since > these sprayed electrons would not be coherent? I don't believe just > hitting a nickel nucleus with electrons will induce LENR. Shouldn't there > be a coherence of all the electrons first to provide charge screening? > > Jojo > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 04, 2012 1:48 PM > *Subject:* [Vo]:Electron Stimulated Luminescence (ESL) > > Electron Stimulated Luminescence (ESL) > > > http://phys.org/news172341986.html > > In December 2011, Lowes will begin carrying a new cathodoluminescence or > Electron Stimulated Luminescence (ESL) R30 light bulb by Vu1 Corporation. > The flood light is expected to retail for $14.98. > > > Cold cathode technology has come to the foreground with the discovery of > carbon nanotubes – nature’s ideal cathode technology. > > ESL technology works by firing electrons at phosphor, which then glows. As > Vu1 explains, the technology is similar to that used in cathode ray tubes > and TVs. However, the bulbs have several improvements, such as in uniform > electron distribution, energy efficiency, phosphor performance and > manufacturing costs. “CRT and TV technology is based on delivering an > electron ‘beam’ and then turning pixels on and off very quickly,” the > company explains on its website. “ESL technology is based on uniformly > delivering a ’spray’ of electrons that illuminate a large surface very > energy efficiently over a long lifetime.” > > From the time, carbon nanotubes have been discovered; cold cathode > technology has come to the forefront, which the company wants to utilize > for attaining better efficiency, highly accurate turn on times, simpler > electronics and lower cost. > > I am very lazy, why reinvent the wheel when all the work has already been > done for us. It is a pain in the butt to build our own nanotubes for our > cold fusion reactor. It might be possible to repurpose an existing device > to do what we want. At $15 it won’t cost us much to try. > > The cold cathode technology uses a nanotube based electron emitter to > stimulate a phosphorous screen. > > We might be able replace the phosphorous screen with a thin layer of > nickel nano-powder. Then use this nanotube based cold cathode to push > electrons onto nickel nano powder that is enclosed in a high pressure > hydrogen envelope. > > This is the kind of thing NASA (and maybe the Navy?) is doing on their > chip. > > Some info I looked at as follows: > > > http://www.google.com/patents?id=JPX3AQAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Drawings+8,035,293&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fdXzT_ytH6Xi0gHCudzFBg&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Drawings%208%2C035%2C293&f=false > > http://lighting.com/vu1-moves-forward/ > > > Cheers: Axil > > > > >
