Wonder if he’s read this book:

 

Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge 
Every Company

http://www.amazon.com/Only-Paranoid-Survive-Exploit-Challenge/dp/0385483821

 

-Mark

 

 

From: noone noone [mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 12:07 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why spammers claim to be Nigerian when they are not

 

He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many times by too 
many people. 

 

At worst, he is a paranoid business man due to having very real enemies. If I 
were in his situation I would be paranoid too.

 

  _____  

From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:24 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Why spammers claim to be Nigerian when they are not

 

I read a fascinating article and paper recently:

"Research Reveals Why Spammers Claim They're Nigerian 

A new paper claims obvious spam email is used to weed out all but the most 
gullible people online."

http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/06/20/nigerian_spam_email_why_spam_email_is_so_obvious_.html

This is about a Microsoft research paper:

http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/167719/WhyFromNigeria.pdf

 

This is a brilliant analysis. I have never heard of the idea before. The gist 
of it is in the headline: Internet scammers living in the U.S. often claim to 
be Nigerian bankers, and they make up the most outrageous, hackneyed and 
unbelievable stories. They want to eliminate all but the most gullible 
potential victims. Here is the title and abstract from Microsoft:


"Why do Nigerian Scammers Say They are from Nigeria?

ABSTRACT

False positives cause many promising detection technologies to be unworkable in 
practice. Attackers, we show, face this problem too. In deciding who to attack 
true positives are targets successfully attacked, while false positives are 
those that are attacked but yield nothing.

This allows us to view the attacker’s problem as a binary classification. The 
most profitable strategy requires accurately distinguishing viable from 
non-viable users, and balancing the relative costs of true and false positives. 
We show that as victim density decreases the fraction of viable users than can 
be profitably attacked drops dramatically. For example, a 10× reduction in 
density can produce a 1000× reduction in the number of victims found. At very 
low victim densities the attacker faces a seemingly intractable Catch-22: 
unless he can distinguish viable from non-viable users with great
accuracy the attacker cannot find enough victims to be profitable. However, only 
by finding large numbers of victims can he learn how to accurately distinguish 
the two.

Finally, this approach suggests an answer to the question in the title. 
Far-fetched tales of West African riches strike most as comical. Our analysis 
suggests that is an advantage to the attacker, not a disadvantage. Since his 
attack has a low density of victims the Nigerian scammer has an over-riding 
need to reduce false positives. By sending an email that repels all but the 
most gullible the scammer gets the most promising marks to self-select, and 
tilts the true to false positive ratio in his favor."

I expect similar predation strategies exist in nature. A gray hawk nests close 
to my house. She often flies just above the trees, in a straight line, making 
an ungodly noise that every prey animal for a mile around knows that only a 
hawk will make. It is as if she is announcing her presence, speed and vector. 
It is the opposite of the stealthy sneak-up-and-grab technique of a cat. It is 
more like what a pack of wolves will do. I assumed this was flush out animals 
and birds that panic. Maybe not. Maybe it is form of the Nigerian scam 
strategy. The hawk drives off the fast prey animals, leaving only slow, 
immature, sick or old animals lagging behind, which are the preferred targets 
for any predator.

 

To bring this discussion on topic --

 

When I read this, I could not at first think of why it bothered me. Then I 
realized. I have often said that Rossi could not be a con-man because he 
inspires no confidence. On the contrary, he makes most people I know want to 
run for the exits. Now I wonder . . . could it be that he is a con-man, and he 
is using a predation strategy similar to these fake Nigerians.

 

- Jed

 

 

Reply via email to