Peter, Jed, I am very aware of possible positive effects of this move.
My main argument is probabilistic. There are multiple reasons, multiple outcomes, which gets confusing at times to keep up with the book-keeping, so to say. Any argument or evidence, which shifts the point of interest in probability-space is most welcome. All the best Guenter ________________________________ Von: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> An: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Gesendet: 22:00 Freitag, 27.Juli 2012 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:ICCF-17: Brillouin is no more? Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com> wrote: Relocating to Canada seems sort of strange. >The Harper government is all but friendly to alternative energies. It would >basically kill the oil and gas industry of Canada. >So why incorporate someone, who potentially kills the golden goose? > You seem to be suggesting that the government of Canada can refuse to let them incorporate, because it does not want cold fusion to succeed. This makes no sense for two reasons: 1. The government has no say in the matter. It cannot refuse to allow an incorporation as long as the activities of the company are legal. There is nothing in the laws of any first-world nation that lets the government vet who can incorporate and who cannot. There are zoning laws and the like, but that is different. 2. There is little chance anyone in the Canadian government is aware of Defkalion, and no chance that anyone takes their claims seriously. - Jed
