Your theory sounds like out of star trek while mine is more battlestar galactica
On Tuesday, August 7, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > Part 1 > > John Rohner describes anomaly of coil heating in noble gas engine during > no movement (1 of > 2)<http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Z0IPWmm7GDc> > > Part 2 > > John Rohner describes anomaly of coil heating in noble gas engine during > no movement (2 of > 2)<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlgiwB8V4sc&feature=player_detailpage> > > My theory explains this anomaly through the teleportation of entangled > particles and their decoherence when they come into contact with the copper > lattice of the copper coil. The decoherence of the delocalized particles > causes extra dimensional heat transport transportation from inside the > reaction chamber. > > This also happens in the Rossi reactor to thermalize gamma radiation. > Test your theory by explaining this anomaly. By the way, you can see this > anomaly first hand and experiment with it by buying the $350 kit. > > That is a small price to pay for a Nobel prize. > > Cheers: Axil > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Abd, > > First off, thank you for sharing your thoughts, you have a gift with > words. > > We all filter the world thru our own beliefs and exerience. > > I have worked as a consulting engineer in industry for the past 21 years > and 5 years prior installing industrial control systems. The bulk of my > projects have been energy related from boilers to turbines to a large > concentrated solar thermal project. I am currently working on a Natural > Gas mid-stream storage & supply system. I have to deal with alot of real > world problems to make systems in the field perform. Not all do. > Unfortunately I do not yet have Jed's team of robots to make my projects > all work. > > When I look at LENR today (this name carries a much nicer connotation/ring > to me than CF) I see a wide range of claimed reactants, products and heat > gains. I also see a wide range of radiation emissions claimed from > nothing to photons, gammas, x-rays, UV and even gravity waves (nanospire) > I see a couple systems that catch my eye with claims in the kW range, both > of these are gas/powder in a relatively low pressure high temp reactor > which might be real and would be game changers if stable and brought to > market. I see NASA already advertising flying LENR airframes into space > but have not claimed one watt of gain from any research yet. > > I see NASA promoting W&L theory and I see you tearing down the W&L theory > and appear soundly in the fusion camp. I see Krivit discrediting cold > fusion. I see Brian Aherm promoting nanomagnetism. W&L promotes beta > decay and ULMNs to cover all the pathways. Mills and hydrinos. Brilluoin > and q-pulse lattice rattling. > > Yes I have more questions maybe you can answer? (loaded question). > > > I am at the point the only thing that explains what everyone is seeing is > quantum singularities hiding in the voids of that lattice devouring atomic > hydrogen and belching out photons, quarks, gluons, etc. mostly showing up > as HEAT. The smallest singularity is theorized to be 22 micrograms based > on a Planck length. Maybe a singularity masquerading as an electron that > is either evaporating or becoming a WIMP? Maybe the singularity carries a > charge and has an affinity for all the oppositely charged ions sent its > way-either SPPs or hydride ions? Maybe the stress and strain and lattice > cracking creates more singularities to bring to the dinner table, > amplifying the effect? Singularities are the perfect black-body heat > engine. Maybe gravity at the quantum level is strong enough to create > these quantum singularities by adding just a few hundred degrees of heat > and extra strain within the lattice? No Coulomb barrier to worry about > penetrating anymore, just have to aim your ions very accurately at an > extremely small target/horizon and there they gooooo..... > > Singularities are the perfect e=mc2 heat engine. > > LHC hot fusion guys recently addresed quantum singularities they might > create and said they would just evaporate quickly. No explosions, just > maybe give off some HEAT and then POOF! Gone. Once they are gone NO MORE > HEAT effect. Maybe that explains the wicked behavior of CF. Since the > event horizon erases all history of original reactants it is also > hard/impossible to nail down pathways-anything goes. Only way I can > explain their hidden mass is that it must be hiding in some of those 11 or > so dimensions available at the quantum level according to string theory. > Singularities are great at increasing entropy. Also, while singularities > are evaporating they get HOTTER, which explains "heat after death" which > would occur while these singularities consume remaining ions and evaporate? > It also explains eruptions in the metallic structure caused by extreme > point sources of high temperature? What I believe we have here my friend > is a magnificent quantum singularity heat engine. > > This is my grand unification theory of cold fusion. No wine involved. > > I was hoping you could answer all of these questions by morning?... > > Godspeed > > > > On Monday, August 6, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > > > At 10:17 AM 8/6/2012, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >
