Peter, I do not believe at this time there is any chance of collapse of a significant amount of matter from one of these things. Unless you give birth to an enormously large gremlin to begin with, they like to reach thermal equilibrium with their surroundings extremely quickly.
There is however alot of energy claimed to be generated in the Papp Engine and much more available from what I see. 1500 Hp (1.1 MW) in a 360 cc engine limited to 2500 cycles/min using 8, 40 kV spark plugs is alot of energy from a rev limited engine. Imagine if you rev it to 8000 RPM... This is a relatively clean source of energy as long as you have the gremlins (collapsed matter) available nearby to suck the energy from the radiation as it leaves. A coil is a good idea also to remove charged particles created from gremlin belching. My understanding is that they emit charged particles. IF DGT wants to create a heater/power generation device I believe they should drop the nanopowder and look at the Papp Engine. If they stick with Nanopowder they should focus on transmutations, which is primarily what they are getting since that is what they are feeding their gremlins. On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > singularity is frightening > peter > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" >>> would work better. >>> >>> T >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >
