Meanwhile, Back in the Florida swamps LENR pioneer http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.i-b-r.org/NeutronSynthesis.pdf&sa=U&ei=nv4tUKGVHKSgywHMqYHQDw&ved=0CBkQFjAC&sig2=2jnJ7E68bs8RTEvQ80nLXA&usg=AFQjCNHrasQAwAaBEkfYm1IQ61UuUIym_g gets rich via NASDAQ http://magnegas.com/announcing-the-purchase-of-manufacturing-facilities (Price Quote: $3.08 Aug. 16, 2012 Market Closed)
Winners earn a living, take risks, scrimp and get their hands dirty while losers idle time away rattling a tin cup for a few "bob" and breaking wind with verbal diarrhea without self support. Each to its own. If the shoe fits, wear it. The spoiled baby boomer remains a baby, needing to put someone down in vain attempts to bolster themselves. Judgmental forays are worshiped as a commandment. However, take care! Noble Gas Engine stock also offered at about $3. Sounds like a " Variation on a Theme of Rossi". Easy, easy ... Chung --- On Thu, 8/16/12, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date: Thursday, August 16, 2012, 6:48 PM Like most predictions of string theory; super-symmetric particles, micro black holes, no one (AKA CERN) has detected them yet at any energy. CERN is way beyond any energy the cold fusion can reach or hot fusion for that matter. The prospects are grim. The string people are disappointed. Stringologists produce theory by the ton and none has been experimentally verified. Don’t stake your theories on strings. Strings are fringe science. Cheers: Axil On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Stewart Simonson <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: Always slept well at night On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, you are right, it did wake me up at night. Did you start having these dreams before or after you first read about quantum singularities? harry > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > No, I am not making it up and it was not a dream >> >> Physics is ultimately a work of the imagination. Over time some of >> those imaginings are retained and studied while others are >> dismissed or forgotten for lack of evidence and other times for >> reasons of fashion or politics and religion. >> >> Physics is not out there, it lives in you. >> >> Harry >> >> >> > A charged black hole is a black hole that possesses electric charge. >> > Since >> > the electromagnetic repulsion in compressing an electrically charged >> > mass is >> > dramatically greater than the gravitational attraction (by about 40 >> > orders >> > of magnitude), it is not expected that black holes with a significant >> > electric charge will be formed in nature. >> > >> > A charged black hole is one of three possible types of black holes that >> > could exist in the theory of gravitation called general relativity. >> > Black >> > holes can be characterized by three (and only three) quantities, its >> > >> > mass M (called a Schwarzschild black hole if it has no angular momentum >> > and >> > no electric charge), >> > angular momentum J (called a Kerr black hole if it has no charge), and >> > electric charge Q (charged black hole or Reissner-Nordström black hole >> > if >> > the angular momentum is zero or a Kerr-Newman black hole if it has both >> > angular momentum and electric charge). >> > >> > A special, mathematically-oriented article describes the >> > Reissner-Nordström >> > metric for a charged, non-rotating black hole. >> > >> > The solutions of Einstein's field equation for the gravitational field >> > of an >> > electrically charged point mass (with zero angular momentum) in empty >> > space >> > was obtained in 1918 by Hans Reissner andGunnar Nordström, not long >> > after >> > Karl Schwarzschild found the Schwarzschild metric as a solution for a >> > point >> > mass without electric charge and angular momentum. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Chemical Engineer <cheme...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Conductivity inversion effects in a metal wire/lattice. It is well >> >> > understood that a singularity carries charge, angular momentum and >> >> > radius >> >> > like any other particle. It is also understood that when they >> >> > evaporate >> >> > they >> >> > emit charged particles. This can have a direct effect on the >> >> > conductivity of >> >> > a metal. >> >> >> >> ah... so you are hypothesizing a particle with a set of special >> >> properties. >> >> Sometimes you refer to this particle by the name 'singularity' and >> >> other times you refer to it by the name 'gremlin'. >> >> >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> harry >> >> >> > >> >
