Does this discovery lend credibility to Rossi with his Hydrogen Nickel (and
apparently some Copper) reactor?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jones Beene" <jone...@pacbell.net>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:29 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Stunning slide from Technova
Slide 16 Takahashi and Kitamura (thanks Akira, Jed et al)
https://decibel.ni.com/content/servlet/JiveServlet/download/23750-1-51320/TS
9240%20Status%20of%20CMN%20CF%20LENR%20Research.pdf
Summary: Ni-Cu on zirconia support, long period of gain, hydrogen and
deuterium compared for gain.
1) Far better results with hydrogen than deuterium !!!!
2) Up to 2 watts per gram max, compared to Celani's technique which is
ten times more
3) Long run showing no sign of drop-off (other than P-in being turned
off)
4) Strange Theory of operation involving 4 units
Brian Ahern sent them one of his early materials (which they mentioned)
and
told Takahashi about the copper-nickel on zirconia support (which they did
not mention) - and which they had fabricated by a local company, and it
was
by far their best results.
However, Ahern had even better results with another sample (much better
than
with the copper-nickel on zirconia support (teaser)... and Celani gets
much
more energy per gram.
Lesson: the door is wide open for improvement, but these guys add further
credibility to Ahern/Celani/etc ... but the most interesting thing - which
has not been well-documented in the past is the side-by-side comparison of
hydrogen with deuterium.
IMPLICATION - there are 20 years of experiments with palladium-deuterium,
most of them using hydrogen as a control. Hydrogen does not work in pure
palladium. Deuterium only seems to work in palladium, and surprisingly is
much poorer in side-by-side with hydrogen, in Ni-Cu (but still gainful).
Most interesting!
THERE IS A LESSON HERE ... but damn, I'm not sure exactly what it is !
Jones
