Also if you go to the later slides in the presentation Lou originally posted, there is some mention of experimental evidence for something like "non-monotonic resistivity" - it may be described as "wild swings" (?) on the slide). I haven't searched the archive for the reference(s).
Jeff On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > This increase in conductivity is casued by the formation of cooper pairs > of protons through the action of thr Shukla-Eliasson Attractive Force. > See my last post - Friedel oscillations > > > Cheers: Axil > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David L Babcock > <ol...@rochester.rr.com>wrote: > >> For any here puzzled- >> Pointing out the obvious: >> If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive >> conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire >> conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which >> temperature rise is causing at the same time, you get non-monotonic >> resistivity vs temp. >> >> Ol' Bab >> >> >> On 9/12/2012 1:36 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: >> >>> Jeff, >>> >>> The reports cited in the presentation are of hi-temp superconductivity (I >>> believe), rather than just non-monotonic resistivity vs. temp phenomena. >>> >>> It may be worth looking at the recently reported hi-temp >>> superconductivity >>> seen in fractal materials - e.g., >>> >>> "High-temperature superconductivity: The benefit of fractal dirt" >>> http://www.nature.com/nature/**journal/v466/n7308/full/**466825a.html<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7308/full/466825a.html> >>> >>> "Fractals make better superconductors" >>> http://www.nanotech-now.com/**news.cgi?story_id=39593<http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=39593> >>> >>> "Fractals promise higher-temperature Superconductors" >>> http://www.stealthskater.com/**Documents/Fractals_04.pdf<http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Fractals_04.pdf> >>> >>> "X-rays control disorder in superconductor" >>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2011/aug/31/x-** >>> rays-control-disorder-in-**superconductor<http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/aug/31/x-rays-control-disorder-in-superconductor> >>> >>> "Fractals boost superconductivity" >>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/**article/news/2010/aug/13/**fractals-boost- >>> **superconductivity<http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2010/aug/13/fractals-boost-superconductivity> >>> >>> -- Lou Pagnucco >>> >>> >>> >>> Jeff Berkowitz wrote: >>> >>>> To answer my own question: yes, here >>>> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/**CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf<http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFcunimnallo.pdf>on >>>> page 3, in item (3) >>>> of the numbered list. >>>> >>>> Of course, it could be some unrelated effect; but decreasing electrical >>>> resistance with increasing temperature is very odd, and it certainly is >>>> an >>>> interesting coincidence. >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Lasers not necessary? Hasn't Celani been reporting a negative >>>>> temperature >>>>> coefficient of resistance that appears about the time his processed >>>>> wires >>>>> begin producing heat? I might have this wrong ... >>>>> >>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:59 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Low Energy Neutron Reaactions (LENRs)" >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/**lewisglarsen<http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen> >>>>>> -- or at -- >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.slideshare.net/**slideshow/embed_code/14256059?** >>>>>> hostedIn=slideshare&referer=**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.** >>>>>> net%2Flewisglarsen#<http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14256059?hostedIn=slideshare&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Flewisglarsen#> >>>>>> >>>>>> - proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface >>>>>> plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the >>>>>> interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively >>>>>> oscillating protons. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps this is testable using laser pulses, as described in - >>>>>> >>>>>> "Surface plasmon enhanced electron acceleration with few-cycle laser >>>>>> pulses" >>>>>> http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/**DombiLPB27_291.pdf<http://www.szfki.hu/~dombi/DombiLPB27_291.pdf> >>>>>> >>>>>> - since they can create field gradients of at least 3.7 X 10^11 V/m >>>>>> (p.293) >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Lou Pagnucco >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >> >
