Axil,

I am not sure that it's relevant, but (at least what appears to be) odd
deterministic heat cycling appears when H2 or D2 is loaded into Pd powder.
See -

"Chaos in oscillatory heat evolution accompanying the sorption of hydrogen
and deuterium in palladium"
http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.3873

"An empirical dependence of frequency in the oscillatory sorption of H2
and D2 in Pd on the first ionization potential of noble gases"
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1501

"Oscillatory Rates of Heat Evolution during Sorption of Hydrogen in
Palladium"
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp805414a

My quick computation does not show any anomalous heat, but maybe some
similar effects occur for Ni.

-- Lou Pagnucco


Axil wrote:
> Piantelli also found the two channel effect in his radiation experiments.
> This behavior was caused by the speed in which hydrogen loading was done
> in
> nickel. Slow loading produced radiation and fast loading produced heat.
>
>
>
> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewenergytimes.com%2Fv2%2Flibrary%2F2004%2F2004Focardi-EvidenceOfElectromagneticRadiation.pdf&ei=WqpaULaAFIXy0gGb94DABQ&usg=AFQjCNHu3w5dimV_JIaouNutOQePoXu2Pg&sig2=D0x1bSsDVfrhx7bM0uaKyg
>
>
>
> A formation of condensate of proton pairs would thermalize the energy
> coming out of these LENR based nuclear reactions.
>
>
>
> If the proton condensate does not form, the LENR associated radiation
> comes
> out of the nucleus as energetic particles since there is no proton
> condensate available to thermalize this nuclear energy.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers:    Axil
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Good points, Jeff
>>
>> Maybe, I'm assuming incorrectly, bu from Mosier-Boss paper excerpt -
>>
>> "These results indicated that there were at least two channels - an
>> aneutronic channel that produced heat (the so-called true
>> Fleischmann-Pons
>> effect) and another channel that favored formation of energetic charged
>> particles, neutrons, and tritium. It was Swartz [3] who suggested that,
>> by
>> adjusting the experimental parameters, one could
>> switch from one channel to the other."
>>
>> - I surmised that rather than just fully aneutronic channels, there were
>> also low energy neutrons, since (I think) transmutations have been
>> reported
>> in the absence of high energy neutron emissions.
>>
>> Yes, Pu-239 is very long-lived, but doesn't this mean it will hang
>> around
>> long enough to capture enough neutrons to convert to some shorter-lived
>> isotope?  And, similarly with other long-lived byproducts?
>>
>> -- Lou Pagnucco
>>
>> Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
>> > I'm having a hard time making sense of this on several levels.
>> >
>> > For a one thing, the Mosier-Boss results (including the paper you link
>> > below and previous papers, all found in a page on their site) document
>> > fast
>> > neutrons, not thermal neutrons. For another thing, fission would put
>> the
>> > lie to their waste claims. Methinks fission is fission; you're going
>> to
>> > get
>> > the standard double-hump distribution of daughters, all radioactive.
>> >
>> > I suppose you could moderate and thermalize the neutrons, But after
>> > neutron
>> > capture (as opposed to fission) by U-238, a short decay chain ensues
>> that
>> > quickly lands on Pu-239, which is long-lived and fissile. Not exactly
>> a
>> > desirable result.
>> >
>> > Is there a real physicist in the house!?  ;-)
>> >
>> > Jeff
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:15 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> A company formed by some SPAWAR alumni (and others), Global Energy
>> >> Corporation claims to have a green fission technology nearly ready
>> for
>> >> testing in smaller markets -
>> >>
>> >> GUAM POWER AUTHORITY EXPLORES NUCLEAR POWER
>> >> Next generation facilities could reduce power costs
>> >> http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/2012/February/02-13-02.htm
>> >>
>> >> Virginia firm offers nuclear energy
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/cnmi-news/local/46996-virginia-firm-offers-nuclear-energy.php
>> >>
>> >> (Company website) http://www.globalenergycorporation.net/
>> >>
>> >> A possibly relevant ICCF-17 paper -
>> >> "It’s not Low Energy – But it is Nuclear" - Pamela A. Mosier-Boss
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Mosier-Boss-Its-Not-Low-Energy-Paper.pdf
>> >>
>> >> My interpretation is that they expect to use LENR to generate
>> relatively
>> >> low-energy neutrons to initiate fission chains starting with U-238
>> and
>> >> terminating in fairly harmless wastes.  To me, it seems similar to
>> the
>> >> Thorium reactor approach.
>> >>
>> >> Their adviser list seems impressive.  Any opinions?
>> >>
>> >> - Lou Pagnucco
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to