Why Rossi is taking energy produced per weight as a power density ? In the
report he says :

                "POWER DENSITY

                        163,4 MW*kg^-1 (onehundred sixtythree point four MWh
per kg)
                        (see the Ragone Plot at pag. 15 of the Penon Report
attached)"

He should have called that the energy density which has no meaning here
cause there are still energy to release of its cylinder ...

It seems, he is always confusing energy and power. With its kWh/h unity
which for means nothing physical.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be] 
> Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 19:06
> To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com'
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7
> 
> If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of 
> powder is awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 )
> 
> Celani's wire is around ~70 W/g 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: vendredi 12 octobre 2012 18:37
> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> > Subject: [Vo]:Hot Cat COP 11.7
> > 
> > http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-corp-releases-new-h
> > ot-cat-report/
> > 

Reply via email to