Regarding this statement in the PDF file foundon the DGT website as follows:
“The third way was the one we found: to “make the mountain disappear" for a very short time." We succeeded by disguising protons in neutrons via stimulation of nickel in Rydberg form. In this form the trajectory of the electron is elongated elliptically, so that at its "perihelion" the system appears as a neutron and not as “the mountain in-between". Thereafter, we cause fusion by applying magnetic fields and pressure". Defkalion Green Technologies states that their Hyperion LENR reactor cores contain ordinary H2 hydrogen gas, nickel powder, and proprietary materials and structures to aid in the reaction. Simple resistance heating elements are turned on to excite the hydrogen gas. The naturally occurring H2 atoms are further excited by bursts of electrical discharges via a spark plug-like device which breaks the H2 into H1 gas and transforms H1 atoms into Rydberg State Hydrogen(RSH) atoms, which have very large, often elliptical electron (cloud) orbits. The excited RSH hydrogen atoms are then squeezed into the nickel atom latticework. "For a brief period of around 10 -13th second, each RSH proton is very close to its electron. Then the RSH nuclei is a masqueraded neutron. As a result, Coulomb forces between such nuclei are almost zero during this short time window." The resulting reaction releases gamma rays and light which are absorbed inside the reactor to produce heat. To the best of my understanding, the orbit of the lone electron in the excited Rydberg State Hydrogen(RSH) atom becomes circular as the angular momentum of that electron is increased by its increasing excitation. This orbital behavior of this lone excited hydrogen electron speaks against the hydrogen atom as a neutron like quasiparticle which is DGT claims to be that root cause of nickel hydrogen fusion. I believe that DGT does not yet understand in detail what is happening inside their reaction. Cheers: Axil On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: > > >> What if NiH heat is not nuclear at all? What if it's hydrinos? (Chemical, >> just an unexpected form of chemistry, though hydrinos *also* might catalyze >> fusion . . . > > > Okay that's possible I suppose. We could test that hypothesis if Mills > would tell us what the upper limits of energy release is per mole of > hydrogen. Years ago I asked him and got some confusing responses. > > - Jed > >
