Another thing I wonder is whether STM obtained the piece of wire from Celani or did the pre-processing by them selves using a different type of constantan wire. The briefing seems not very clear on that.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Combining data from the table on the left and the new graph (and some >> plausible assumptions) I managed to plot a graph of input power vs excess >> power: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/L9CV7.png >> >> At the highest point it's 21.8% more output power than the input. >> > > Good job. > > Again, this gives me a bad feeling. The curve is too smooth. Too > predictable. Cold fusion excess heat never happens in a fixed ratio > compared to input, or as a varying function of input. It is not > predictable. With powder, you see nothing at low temperatures, and then it > appears, but it fluctuates. > > This kind of smooth, predictable-looking curve is characteristic of an > artifact. I am not saying it is an artifact for sure, but it makes me > uncomfortable. > > As I said yesterday, above all, they need calibration data in the same > range as the anomalous heat. That would put to rest most of my concerns. > > - Jed > >
