Are we sure that new stars will not be born? If so then when could the last of those stop forming and burn out?
This is of course all based on the Big bang theory,which is not the only theory nor the only possibility. If you decide to listen to the minority not the majority this theory too could be overturned Just because science is seldom ever settled on hardly anything to everyone's agreement does not mean we can't use sensible evidence based projections. Now if *everyone* does agree on something in science, it will probably be wrong. John On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:31 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > G is not a constant. It is entropic acceleration. It is dependent upon > the concentration of entropy in that area of space. See: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Verlinde > > Moon gravitational field varies widely, much higher around some craters. > Apollo missions had to take into account the varying gravitational > acceleration as they orbited the moon else it would throw them off. > http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/grail/news/grail20121205.html > > See the ball would not bounce: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MY1ITVF6tfc > > In the end gravity is the collapse of baryonic matter due to dark matter > passing though it. Time also collapses on the surface of dark matter. > > Stewart > Darkmattersalot.com > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I wrote: >> >> >>> His calculation was off by roughly factor of two, but our knowledge of >>> the sun's distance has improved immeasurably since then, and we also know >>> the mass of the earth more accurately. >>> >> >> I should say we know the gravitational constant G more accurately. >> >> In the first approximation you ignore the mass of the planet. Strictly >> speaking the sun and planets orbit around their common centers of gravity, >> which must be very complicated indeed. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
