Fran; "The syntax becomes difficult as time from one perspective is space from 
another."
 
WELL SAID/Never better. . .



From: francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:I feel really good about what I have done
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:53:44 +0000




Jones,
        Nice suggestions, as for the wavelength being too long I would suggest 
that the same mechanism responsible for the odd black light spectrum emitted by 
Mills powder will have the opposite effect on the wavelength of radiation 
propagating into the Casimir cavity such that travelling wave sees the walls of 
the cavity growing further apart locally while the spacing remains fixed from 
our perspective.. a relativistic environment induced by Casimir suppression of 
virtual particles between the walls of the cavity. My posit is that the 
wavelength will eventually find an area where the cavity wall suppress space 
time sufficiently that from our perspective the wave is exactly the desired 
frequency. The syntax becomes difficult as time from one perspective is space 
from another.
Regards
Fran
 
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] 
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:02 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:I feel really good about what I have done
 
 
 
 
From: Frank Z 
 
It predicts that if you can induce a wave motion in the dissolved hydrogen or 
deuterium with a velocity of  one mega meter per second cold fusion will 
progress.  Normal sound velocity in a solid is 2 kilo meters per second.  Now 
we reduced the cold fusion process down to a material condition.  We must apply 
external stimulation at 1 million meters per second.  We must transfer that 
velocity to the dissolved protons.
 
The problem now become how can we increase the external stimulation.  Laser, 
radio wave, or thermal. How can we get the dissolved deuterium to resonate with 
and effectively couple with a velocity of one mega-meter per second.  The 
applied transverse vibrations must induce a wave motion of 1,094,000 meters per 
second in the dissolve protons.  I don't know the answer of how to do this yet. 
 
 
 
 
One possible suggestion for analyzing hydrogen gain to accommodate 
megahertz-meter, since we have the luxury of working backwards from some known 
values which are thought to work - would be based on having uniform pore size 
of Casimir dimensions for containing hydrogen – say 8-10 nm in diameter. There 
is evidence of relativistic hydrogen in such pores so they could easily couple 
to photons which were in semi-coherence with phonons at the peak blackbody 
frequency.
 
You would want the cavities and the encompassing nickel alloy to vibrate at 
roughly a frequency equivalent to the trigger temperature of the reaction (its 
peak blackbody frequency of ~40 THz). The needed wavelength would therefore be 
much longer than the cavity diameter, but photons would couple to the protons 
in the cavity in a known way which would be related to the fine structure 
constant.
 
Around 40 THz and 600+ K is within the range of mid-IR frequencies/temperature 
which is applicable to trigger a Celani type experiment using a nickel alloy. 
The peak blackbody wavelength would be around 7 microns. This wavelength times 
the frequency is about 300 times too long for megahertz-meter of course -- but 
we would never expect heat alone to suffice. Assuming that the frequency times 
the cavity diameter were to equal about 3200 meters per second – that is 300 
times too low, but a combination of both is about right – one megahertz meter. 
How you verbalize that so that it makes sense is not clear. I suspect that this 
is where the fine structure constant comes into play.
 
Bottom line - I could envision a reactor working gainfully with 8 nm cavities 
and 40 THz thermal semi-coherency based on positive feedback of semi-coherent 
photons at that frequency – with very high net gain. 
 
If the energy gain is found to be especially robust at roughly those 
parameters, Frank should be congratulated. 
 
Jones


 
                                          

Reply via email to