Chem, I think you should stick to chemistry. I don't want to be impolite but which nonsense is this? What is an entropic particle? LOL Common. Giovanni
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > According to my Research & Theory: > > 1) The Earth has an entropic dark matter core and creates its own iron > and nickel. Geologists are way over their head trying to explain it away > as a bar magnet. > 2) The Earth's entropic core creates its own magnetic fields thru > annihilation and charged orbital dark matter and other particles > 3) The Earth's entropic core battery gets recharged as the sun spits > entropic particles at us triggering our weather and seismic events out here > on the crust. Many of the large particles coalesce with the Earth's > entropic core and also cool the Earth down > 4) We are just part of the colorful 5% crust. > 5) If you look at that Chandra X-Ray Matrix, the Earth is one of the > intersecting/nodal points connected to the Sun which is a larger nodal > point. > 6) The sun is about to get a millennial supply of orbital dark matter > from those two great comets coming . I just pray no nuclei break off and > come our way. Should be a good show either way. > > Stewart > darkmattersalot.com > > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < > gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There are many problems with this theory. >> One even if all these ideas would hold they could be applied only to >> later stages of the universe life because iron and nickel are created by >> massive stars and then released into space when they died as supernovae. >> >> Also consider that iron and heavy materials are very rare exactly because >> only very massive stars can produce these materials. >> Furthermore what you call natural magnetism is not something that occurs >> so naturally for dust in space. >> On earth natural magnetized material become magnetized because of the >> Earth magnetic field. Look up how magnetic rocks get magnetized in wiki: >> >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_magnetism#Thermoremanent_magnetization_.28TRM.29 >> >> You need a huge dynamo magnet like the one at the core of the earth to >> magnetize small things like rocks. >> >> The dynamo magnet is created by plasma that rotates at the center of the >> Earth and creates by induction a magnetic field. The fact that there is >> iron at the core helps to make the magnetic field stronger and helps to >> carry the electrical current of the plasma but it is not the source per se >> of the magnetic field of the earth. The sun doesn't have iron at the core >> and it has a very strong magnetic field. >> >> The iron ended up at the core of the Earth because it is heavier >> than silica and the other lighter elements that make the earth crust. >> >> Gravity is the dominant force at astronomical scales because it acts on >> everything not special materials (like in the case for magnetism). Yes, it >> is weak but when you are dealing with huge quantity of stuff that dominates >> all the other forces in particular because electrostatic charges tend to >> neutralize themselves coming in pairs and magnetic forces are produced by >> moving charges and decay rapidly. >> >> And so on... >> The theory makes not much sense in physical terms. Sorry. >> Giovanni >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:55 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >>> The vortex-l group of individuals have a great deal of knowledge and >>> open minds that I enjoy prodding on occasions. This morning an unusual >>> concept came into my mind which resulted in a hypothesis that I would like >>> to put forth. >>> >>> Suppose that the universe is organized by the influence of magnetic >>> attractions between materials such as iron and nickel that can be >>> permanently magnetized instead of gravity, at least in the formative years. >>> We all know that gravitation is by far the weakest force within the >>> universe so why should we assume that such a modest effect would dominate? >>> My hypothesis is that this concept is entirely backwards and that the >>> basic structures are formed by magnetic influences. After the magnetic >>> effects have completed their portion of the task the gravitational >>> influence completes the puzzle. >>> >>> Picture a region in open space that has a large collection of dust and >>> gases. It is certain that many specs of iron or nickel laden dust exist >>> within this region and that many of these posses natural magnetic fields. >>> The attraction due to the magnetic field would dominate the net attraction >>> between these particles by an extremely large margin. As time progresses >>> the magnetized portions would strongly attract and then collect together >>> into larger magnetic units. This should occur far faster than >>> gravitational collection due to the enormous difference in forces. >>> >>> So, masses such as the earth's core come together quickly and consist >>> of large concentrations of iron and nickel and any other magnetic >>> materials. The same would occur in the early formations that eventually >>> become other planets and stars. When the collection of magnetic materials >>> is mostly completed, then it would be natural for the less magnetic matter >>> to be gravitationally concentrated toward these large metallic centers. >>> >>> In my model, it seems likely that pebbles held together magnetically >>> should withstand much more pounding in collisions than those merely >>> confined by gravity. This difference in cohesive strength should further >>> tend to result in large magnetic bundles at the expense of those formed of >>> other materials. With this in mind, it seems likely that all the planets >>> that form in a region of space that contains the metals that can be >>> magnetized will grow an iron like core first and quickly until these >>> materials have been swept clean of the region. This process is then >>> followed by the gravitational attraction of the metal cores to the gasses >>> and other materials. >>> >>> The same type of influence should be exhibited throughout the universe >>> at large. Some of the formations have appearances that seem unusual if >>> gravitation is the prime force at work. Gravity does not generate shapes >>> with spatial directivity to the degree that magnetic attraction does. >>> Gravity only pulls items towards each other in a straight line. Magnetic >>> materials generally have a dipole field or a complex field that is composed >>> of the addition of many such dipoles. >>> >>> If we consider that my hypothesis results in the collection of the >>> magnetic materials rapidly and dominantly throughout space, then each of >>> these would tend to influence others of their kind in the near vicinity. >>> This should dominate the early formation of matter that eventually leads >>> to galaxies, etc. I suppose that it is a good thing that the magnetic >>> fields of iron masses falls off rapidly with distance due to the dipole >>> nature or the universe might be dominated by truly enormous collections of >>> magnetic core objects. The shorter range of these dipoles compared to the >>> monopole of gravity allow what we observe today. >>> >>> Is it possible that the enormous black holes at the centers of >>> galaxies began in this magnetic manner? It would not be difficult to >>> imagine that most of the iron and other magnetic materials would be swept >>> together first and fast if present within a nearly created dust cloud. >>> Once a core has been established, it should easily dominate the remainder >>> of the cloud and attract the gasses by its quickly formed gravitational >>> field that reaches far into space. >>> >>> Another idea to consider is that the strong magnetic field at the core >>> of the black hole reaches out far enough to impart directivity to the >>> motion of materials moving in the direction towards its center. Any >>> smaller magnetic masses would be pushed or pulled by the mother field of >>> the hole into directions that tend to follow its field pattern. The >>> smaller magnetic components would then impart some of this force upon the >>> gases and other materials by direct coupling among them. As the total >>> combination of materials approach the hole, the kinetic energy imparted >>> upon the mass send it past the north or south polar region into orbit. It >>> is premature to attempt to define the structure of a black hole under the >>> influence of magnetic effects until a more complete picture emerges. >>> >>> I can visualize the wild and amazing behavior that would be imparted >>> upon a gas with magnetic particles immersed within as it approaches a large >>> magnetic black hole. Once the gas is turned into a plasma by the heat and >>> forces applied, it would possess a tremendous electric current induced >>> within by the motion through the hole's magnetic field. Great forces could >>> occur that may result in the beams that are seen emitted by the galactic >>> center black holes. Perhaps someone could allow a super computer the >>> chance to predict this behavior. >>> >>> The hypothesis is supported by the known core of the earth. this is >>> known to be composed of iron and nickel. >>> >>> Meteorites are composed of various materials. The metallic ones have >>> a large concentrations of magnetic matter within that may have collected >>> together rapidly at the formation of the parent body. >>> >>> The shape of the clouds associated with the enormous explosions of >>> super nova tend to be non symmetrical on many occasions with patterns >>> associated with dipole or quadrapole fields. >>> >>> Do other vortex members see support of reasons to believe that this >>> hypothesis is not workable? I am seeking inputs from our esteemed members >>> that might help to put this puzzle together. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
