David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: I realize that you were just using the sine wave process as an example. I > pointed out that the time period spanned by the data is important to help > catch issues of this nature. I acknowledge that it is possible for a very > long delayed effect to come into play during or after the samples.
If this system was generating normal cold fusion excess heat, it would be readily apparent. You would not need complex algorithms to tease that heat out of the data. Fleischmann and Miles use complex algorithms to explore the heat in detail, but a first-approximation method shows there is heat. I do not think this system is producing any heat. Fluctuations plus or minus 0.6 W on this scale are noise. - Jed
