Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining LENR - II

[Kevin O'Malley]

>
>  Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote:
>
> When I recently suggested in response to Peter Gluck's question [1] that a
>> testable theory was a necessity for LENR to be recognized as a great
>> invention [2], it sure seemed like you all disagreed.
>>
>
>
***There currently is no accepted theory of gravity.  There is a law of
gravity but no widely accepted theory.  That didn't stop millions of people
from stepping onto airplanes and going for an anti-gravity ride on a great
invention.  And in fact, when the Wright brothers got a patent for their
invention, they did not have to generate the equation of flight, did they?