Thank you Axil,
After looking at that power point for a few hours now, it has me
deeply intrigued. I really never looked into W&L theory on LENR because
it seemed pretty far fetched that nuclear-weak interactions could be
driving the heat events. It's probably a bias I developed when discussing
the PEP chain nuclear synthesis for the Ni-H experiments. PEP (p+e+p -> D)
just never seemed possible given the models of the nuclear shell.
I've changed my mind. I am beginning to understand WL theory and it has
really taken me aback. A (WL) neutron forms in a P+(e cloud) -> n. The
neutron is ultra-low momentum so interacts strongly with any open nuclear
shell slot. From there, any number of processes could occur. In my mind,
it certainly suggest a method were Ni-H can realistically work.
This theory might actually be testable with my Nickel-Borax experiment, or
suggest a nano-metal-boron + H. If a neutron hits a B10 the result is B10
+ n -> Li7 + He4. or B10 + n -> B11. Then p+B11 -> 3 He4 + 8.7MeV if
somehow n -> p + e + anti-neutrino such that n+B11 -> 3 He4 + e +
anti-neutrino + 8.7MeV.
Interesting enough, is the observation that resistance drops in the
electrolysis of Ni-H in borax. This fits very well with WL theory on
protonic superconductivity. Since late 80's I've thought CF would have to
show protonic superconductivity before fusion, simply because of the charge
a proton/deuteron carries and the quantum wave overlap thats needed prior
to fusion.
All and all, this is a very interesting read. I'm becoming a real fan of
the WL theory.
Best Regards,
Chuck
----
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CDIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnewenergytimes.com%2Fv2%2Fsr%2FWL%2Fslides%2F20120911LatticeEnergySlides.pdf&ei=dXIsUcnPA6m80AHAz4CgBg&usg=AFQjCNExjKwx5EhG-rjpMn1BTnHckJMWjQ&sig2=W8FrUpUJEa1--spqHHDAsA
>
> Some interesting stuff. Maybe W&L are getting closer to the truth. Enjoy...
> Cheers: Axil
>
