Should read In plain language, when nano-particles are packed together so that they touch in many places, the ability to downshift EMF from high frequency to a lower frequency is increased by 5000 times with the energy of the photon absorbed in the electric field between the nanoparticles.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://nanophotonics.csic.es/static/publications/pdfs/paper203.pdf > Organized plasmonic clusters with high coordination number and > extraordinary enhancement in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) > > > > <snip>In summary, we have shown that by using PF68 coating and emulsion > clustering it is possible to produce plasmonic nanoparticle molecules with > high symmetry and coordination index, and that they can be separated by > applying density gradient centrifugation. PF68 produces narrow > interparticle gaps with subsequent strong optical interactions while > allowing the analytes to diffuse inside the gaps, where gigantic electric > fields are generated, as we have shown by directly measuring the SERS > enhancement in the clusters. Our geometrical nanostructures not only open a > new path for the investigation of optical interactions between > nanoparticles, but they also have great potential for applications to > sensing and nonlinear nanophotonics. <snip> > In plain language, when nano-particles are packed together so that they > touch in many places, the ability to downshift EMF from high frequency to a > lower frequency is increased by 5000 times with the of the photon absorbed > in the electric field between the nanoparticles. > > This article indicates that the electric field between nano-particles goes > up exponentally with the number of particles that touch each other; and > with associated radiation shilding. > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Recapitulating your famous quote as follows” >> >> >> >> “Many explanations have been proposed that are based on imagined ways >> energy could accumulate in sufficient amount in the chemical lattice to >> overcome the Coulomb barrier, either directly or as result of neutron >> formation. These processes also occasionally involve accumulation of extra >> electrons between the hydrogen nuclei as another way to hide the barrier. >> These suggestions ignore the severe limitations a chemical lattice imposes >> on energy accumulation and electron structure. Some proposed processes even >> ignore obvious conflicts with what has been observed. Consequently, none >> have been useful in directing future research or have achieved universal >> acceptance.” >> >> Recent work in nanoplasmonics have demonstrated an electromagnetic field >> amplification of 700 times in enhancement. >> This amplification can be amplified through the strengthening of negative >> charge accumulated in the lattice as well as particle size resonance >> matching with the ambient heat of the system. >> >> Ed you basic assumptions about charge accumulation are now proven to be >> incorrect. Will you adjust your theory to reflect these new factors? >> >> These nanoplasmonic experimental techniques can be adapted directly to >> LENR research, Are you willing to run such experiments? >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >>> Dave, what behavior of LENR can only be explained by proposing coupling >>> between the NAE sites? Of course, coupling is expected based on local >>> temperature and a photon flux. What more do you propose? >>> >>> Ed >>> >>> On Feb 24, 2013, at 2:26 PM, David Roberson wrote: >>> >>> Robin, >>> >>> The net energy released by a single fusion reaction is measured in the >>> MeV, not eV. That is why I believe that there is a mutual interaction >>> between individual NAE. The local heat energy release is large and can not >>> escape the area except through diffusion which is a slow process compared >>> to the reaction time associated with nuclear effects. >>> >>> This should behave much like raising the local temperature by many >>> degrees Kelvin which should encourage reactions by nearby NAEs if we assume >>> a positive temperature coefficient for LENR. >>> >>> Ed's theory handles activity at a single NAE that he states will >>> continue until completion. My suggested addition is a system level >>> coupling that will now explain other observations. When an addition >>> improves a theory, it should be incorporated into an improved one. Now we >>> can consider the behavior of a device exhibiting LENR as being composed of >>> two different type of responses. The first is the original one where NAE >>> generate copious amounts of energy as the elements within fuse. The >>> addition explains craters and hot spots which are hypothesized to be >>> associated with the density of the NAE sites. >>> >>> So far there has been no evidence that coupling does not exist between >>> NAE and a couple of good examples that suggest that this is happening. We >>> should seek out unusual behavior that does not meet expected performance >>> and attempt to explain the discrepancy. Do you know of any evidence that >>> coupling between active regions does not exist? >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com> >>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 1:59 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV >>> >>> In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:26:37 -0700: >>> Hi, >>> [snip] >>> >You ask several questions at the same time. The LENR process requires >>> >energy to overcome a slight energy barrier present within the overall >>> >process. Consequently, it has a positive temperature effect. In other >>> >words, some energy is required to initiate each fusion event. Once >>> >initiated, each fusion reaction goes on without any more help and >>> >releases its energy. Consequently, the initiation reaction will >>> >become faster, the more energy that is applied in any form. This >>> >energy can take the form of increased temperature, laser light, RF or >>> >any other source that can couple to the rate limiting reaction. The >>> >important information comes from identifying the rate limiting step so >>> >that the extra energy can be applied more effectively. This requires a >>> >theory. >>> >>> At the temperature increases common in LENR experiments, the amount of heat >>> energy added is only a tiny fraction of an eV. The theory that best matches >>> this >>> is Hydrinos, because a tiny fraction of an eV is all that is needed to >>> match the >>> difference in energy between the "energy hole" of Hydrinos, and the "energy >>> hole" provided by many common catalysts. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robin van Spaandonk >>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >>> >>> >>> >> >
