Dear Ed, Your arguments here have great success, our dear Mary Yugo is using them in her comments for annihilating this report. I think you as NAE expert are focusing on the second idea. 1- is true indeed. The total emissivity changes as evrything changes but how great must be these changes in order to invalidate completely the results, so we can say NO excess heat, the authors are in total error? Very improbable they are so unskilled that they hve not realized this.
I have tried long ago to convince you that at high temperatures the mortlity of the NAE is high but their natality is also high. LENR+ works this way at high NAE density in direct opposition with LENR with preformed NAE many of them inactivated. I had a moment of truth when I have seen that DGT's active core worked well over 650 C- this is a different process! Yiannis has tried to tell you where are the NAE located and what's their nature, they are not cracks. And this is fine because cracking is essentialy unmanageable This Report is far from perfect but its conclusions are certain: lots of excess heat. On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> > *Date: *May 20, 2013 9:11:57 AM MDT > *To: *c...@googlegroups.com > *Cc: *Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> > *Subject: **Re: CMNS: Rossi's 3rd party test released:* > > Before we get too excited. I think two questions need to be answered. > > 1. When was the calibration done and under what conditions. The amount of > heat being radiated depends on the value of the effective total emissivity > of the surface. This value will change with time and temperature. > Therefore, the value needs to be determined as a function of temperature > both before and after the hot-cat was heated. Details about how the > temperature of the surface was determined also need to be provided. A > detailed description of the test is required before these claims can be > accepted. > > 2. How long does the hot-cat function at such high temperatures? This time > will determine whether the device is a practical source of energy. The > extra energy may be real, but if it only lasts a short time before the NAE > is destroyed, the value of the design is limited. > > Ed Storms > On May 19, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913 > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "CMNS" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to cmns+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to c...@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cmns?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
