Jed, I vote to keep him off for a while. Perhaps you missed his insults toward me and others on the list.
What I find particularly funny is that he did not even realize that what I stated was true! If he eventually makes that spice model that I begged him and his friend Duncan to do, he might want to apologize. I built a model in less than 15 minutes that showed my position was completely valid. A cooling off period might change his attitude. How about a condition attached to his return:Build and test that spice model. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 4:04 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:MODERATOR: andrewppp removed William Beaty <bi...@eskimo.com> wrote: multiple violations of rule 2. (I suspect that he didn't read the rules before subscribing.) Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me. Rule 2. NO SNEERING. Ridicule, derision, scoffing, and ad-hominem is banned. Debunking or "Pathological Skepticism" is banned (see the link.) The tone here should be one of legitimate disagreement and respectful debate. . . . http://www.amasci.com/weird/wvort.html#rules Perhaps you can invite him back after a bit? Also maybe Abd? I miss him. They might not swallow their pride and return. Maybe you should say "I acted too hastily, I apologize." Say this whether you mean it or not. That's how they do things in Japan. - Jed
