thanks for the reminding. I should not have read AE van Vogt books when teenager... I would be mainstream and happy.
2013/5/30 Berke Durak <berke.du...@gmail.com> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > That is completely wrong. In experimental science you never need to > explain > > how something works in order to confirm it is real. You just need to > > replicate it and show there is no error in the instruments or techniques. > > The map = Theory > The territory = Experiments > It's not on the map = No good theory > If it's not on the map, it can't exist! (Our map makers are very > good.) = It doesn't fit physics thus it's pseudo-science! (Our > scientists are very good.) > > -- > Berke Durak > >
