I agree, the contribution by Cude has long since lost its value. His
issues have been discussed and answered several times. He is never
going to accept the basic claims, so why bother. Nevertheless, his
response is answered and the the answer creates a response, with no
end in sight. Enough already!!.
Ed Storms
On Jun 4, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Robert Ellefson wrote:
> ... at what point does this incessant (IMO) kind posting behavior
considered
> a nuisance and hindrance to on-going Vortex discussions? Now, if
Cude is
> genuinely making a good contribution I’ll have nothing more to say
on
> this matter. But it would be interesting to hear a consensus on
how much
> of a genuine contribution Cude is allegedly making - from other
Vort members.
Now that I am subscribed to the list, I have the ability to filter
people
such as Cude directly. However, there is no reasonable means of
filtering
the large volume of useless responses to his postings. So, as when
I read
the vortex web archives only, I am left to scan for names I
recognize that I
suspect may have something to contribute through the noise. This is
tedious
and fundamentally error-prone. The result is that I typically
delete en masse
the majority of related discussions. I don't
Because I quickly elected to simply ignore pseudo-skeptics such as
Cude,
I cannot make specific claims as to the contents of his posts, only
that I do
not care to read them. However, I can claim that his posts are in
fact quite
disruptive to the flow of discussion and hence to the purpose of
this list.
If I were moderating this list, I would not tolerate it.
-Robert
