Take note from the reference:
All experimental results presented above can be interpreted on the basis of the processes (1), (3), and (4). Indeed, processes (1)-(3) dominate at low initial Tritium content in D2O (10-7 Curie/l) and presence of electrons having kinetic energy *E*e ~ 5-10 eV in cold plasma. As a result, Tritium content increases by 3 orders of magnitude. On the other hand, predominant beta-decay of Triton takes place under relatively high initial Tritium beta-activity ~ 10-3 Curie/l. How does the “inner shake-up” (“in-shake-up”) state of the nucleus described in this paper correspond to what the W&L theory says it does? The energy of the electron is no more than 10 eV. And the *KEY point *that all LENR theories fail to address is how excited nuclear processes stabilize excited isotopes in small fractions of seconds instead of years and decades. W&L theory does not address accelerated radioactive isotope stabilization. This means that the W&L theory is wrong, wrong, wrong. The other theories that don’t address stabilization that are out there are also all wrong. Which theories address weak force stabilization? Please tell me. In nuclear physics, adding a neutron to elements usually leads to fission and always results in unstable daughter elements. Please supply a nuclear reaction that stabilizes a nuclear reaction by adding a neutron. *Anapoles? Very, very speculative. Is anyone else proposing that yet?* *If they are the answer, then congratulations for finding it.* The Anapole is an effort to show that a special form of EMF(Anapole) will lead to weak force effects in nuclei with an even number of nucleons via the PNC nuclear mechanism. These special even isotopes have large PNC nuclear profile and so do unstable isotopes. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHp-ocXIs1U Parity Non-Conservation in the Weak Interaction Also see: MONOPONUCLEOSIS - The wonderful things that monopoles can do to nuclei if they are there. http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/1983/conf/Conf-83-107-T.pdf No theory that I know about currently addresses LENR reactions in only nuclei with an even number of nucleons: Ni58, Ni60, Ni62, Ni64. The W&L theory does not do this, neither does the BEC theory. If you know of a theory that use low energy electrons, stabilizes excited isotopes, and uses only an even number of nucleons: Ni58, Ni60, Ni62, Ni64 in its LENR reaction please tell me about it. The anapole field is what monopoles are supposed to use in their variety of LENR reaction. Monopoles have been around as a possible cause of LENR for some time now, decades. Anapole magnetic radiation produced by a quasi-nanostructure object is a monopole type reaction. * * On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: > Axil, > > First, there are a number of proposals on how radioactivity is attenuated > (assuming reports are even correct.) Perhaps one, more than one, or none > are correct. > > I don't follow your neutron remark. > Presumably, your remark about nanoparticles references e-m field > super-focusing. Does that involve increasing charged particle energies? > > Anapoles? Very, very speculative. Is anyone else proposing that yet? > If they are the answer, then congratulations for finding it. > > -- Lou Pagnucco > > Axil wrote: > > One of the features that LENR demonstrates is the stabilization of > > unstable radioactive isotopes. > > > > In the referenced paper, the LENR reaction supported by nanoparticles > > stabilized tritium. The production of low energy neutrons will not meet > > that required functionality that a viable LENR theory must demonstrate. > > > > This weak force based functionality is a hole in the W&L neutron based > > theory. > > Anapole EMF can penetrate into the nucleus > > [...] > >
