In essence they are convinced that LENR is junk science and won't allow anything to appear that might be interpreted as supporting it. Mentioning any supporting evidence is discounted by calling it "debate". I hadn't realized just how bad Wikipedia was until I had this first hand experience.
I had a go at correcting the Wikipedia article on Rossi's E-Cat and got
topic banned for my trouble. Look at the "talk page" about three
quarters down (Parallel) When I started, half the intro was a very
negative piece lifted from a blog as a reliable source. The existing
editors like AndyTheGrumo wouldn't even accept that there had been an
independent test by Elforsk.
- [Vo]: after, ISCMNS, ICCF article at Wikipedia up for deletio... Alain Sepeda
- Re: [Vo]: after, ISCMNS, ICCF article at Wikipedia up fo... Moab Moab
- [Vo]: after, ISCMNS, ICCF article at Wikipedia up for de... a.ashfield