The NAE is a topological construction. It appears whenever the required shape comes into existence.
Once created, the NAE can be static, or it can come into existence and then disappear in a variable timeframe; I call this a dynamic NAE. The energy produced by a dynamic NAE is proportional to its production rate compared to its destruction rate. What is important to the effectiveness of a NAE in LENR is the output of the NAE; that output is its ability to produce an anapole magnetic field. Examples of NAE are cavitation bubbles, Solitons of surface plasmons as formed between nanoparticles, ring current on the surfaces of nanowires, stress cracks in metal lattices, ring electron currents on, in, and around nano-protrusions on metallic surfaces. Magnetic nano-clusters formed on the surface of nickel and other magnetic materials when the temperature of the magnetic material exceeds its curie temperature. Also see the following as a source of anapole magnetic fields in spin ice: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1011/1011.1174.pdf Dirac Strings and Magnetic Monopoles in Spin Ice Dy2Ti2O7 On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:37 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > > In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:03:00 -0600: >> Hi, >> >>> The sequence you suggest is not observed!! Therefore, we must agree, >>> transmutation CAN NOT be the source of heat from an e-Cat. >>> >> >> It is not logical to state that because the results of a particular >> transmutation theory are not in evidence, then all transmutation must be >> ruled >> out. >> > > Yes, all transmutation as a source of energy can be ruled out. The targets > cannot move. They cannot seek out the NAE. Either the NAE is located in a > particle, in which case the reaction can exhaust all the target in that > small particle or the particle is dead and no transmutation can occur in > that particle. The target cannot move to where the NAE might be located. > This severely limits how much energy can come from this source, which is > less than is reported. Hydrogen as a source of energy does not have this > problem because, as a gas, it can seek out every NAE in each active > particle and continue to make energy as long as the gas is supplied. > > > >> Oh, and BTW, your own theory is also a transmutation theory (in the >> broadest >> sense). ;) >> > > No, my theory is based on FUSION of hydrogen isotopes. We need to be clear > how we define words because otherwise we will never understand the process. > I believe that transmutation takes place as a minor consequence of fusion > in the same NAE if a target nuclei happens to be in the wrong place at the > wrong time. Otherwise, transmutation does not occur. > > Ed > > >> >>> Ed >>> On Jun 22, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >>> >>> The transmutation model that I believe that the ash assays of LENR >>>> reactors point to is a quark plasma model in which nuclei are broken >>>> down by fission and concurrently built up by fusion. The elements so >>>> derived could be reprocessed by a reaction reformulation process >>>> indefinitely. >>>> >>>> For example, Ni fusions to Cu by addition of another p, then it >>>> fissions to Co, then fissions to Fe, then fission to Cr, then >>>> fission to Ti, then fusions to V, then fusions to Cr and so on over >>>> and over again. >>>> >>>> In this way, the energy (E=Mc2) content of the initial fuel load of >>>> metal and gas is gradually released by repetitive nuclear processes. >>>> The mass of the fuel load gradually evaporates over months of >>>> operation. >>>> >>>> As your calculations show, this is the only way that a Ni/H reaction >>>> can operate for months of years without reload. >>>> >>>> This long duration reaction fuel load requirement puts a tight limit >>>> on the reactions that can produce this long duration release of >>>> nuclear power. >>>> >>> [snip] >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.**com/project.html<http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html> >> >> >
