The one advantage that knowledge gained from nanoplasmonics offers is that such knowledge can be trusted as experimentally validated.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com > wrote: > Ed,**** > > I don’t understand why you are so reluctant to consider > the gap between nanoparticles as capable of supporting NAE. The geometry is > essentially the inverse of a skeletal catalyst- I am more likely to believe > the particles are inert and solid - only the geometry formed between > particles is active – it is the same region that experiences stiction > force which tends to make these gaps even smaller to the limit of particle > shape and packing geometry. I think the micro scale tubules used by Rossi > may combine micro and nano cavities as the bodies both pack together and > their protrusions interlace to form smaller and smaller pockets between the > particles. Perhaps a marriage made in heaven if the IR energy feeding > plasmons theory has any weight.**** > > Fran **** > > ** ** > > *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com] > *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2013 11:55 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Cc:* Edmund Storms > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Interesting paper from nature about > successful cold fusion experiment**** > > ** ** > > I'm glad to see a paper by Mizuno. But this paper raises an interesting > question, Are nanoparticles the NAE? **** > > ** ** > > I personally believe nanoparticles alone are inert. However, particles of > a critical size are the HOST for the NAE. In other words, the nano-gap I > propose to be the NAE grows in a particle and the particle size determines > the size of the gap. After all, CF has been found to occur under a variety > of conditions, including in complete absence of nanoparticles. However, > nano-gaps can form in any material, but not frequently with the correct > dimension. **** > > ** ** > > The power being generated is determined by the number NAE present. The > better the material is able to create nano-gaps, the more power will be > produced. Use of small particles improves this ability. Consequently, I'm > suggesting that people should not focus on the particle itself but on what > is happening within the particle. Unless the NAE is produced within the > particle, the particle is inert no matter what size it has. **** > > ** ** > > Ed**** > > On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:**** > > > > **** > > Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:**** > > ** ** > > Eric, ion bombardment has a rich literature containing 90 references in > my library. You need to read this before speculation is useful. Ion > bombardment can produce either hot fusion and/or cold fusion, depending on > the conditions and applied energy. Low energy favors cold fusion if the NAE > is present and high energy favors hot fusion without a NAE.**** > > ** ** > > At ICCF18 I will be presenting a poster session paper by Mizuno showing > that ion bombardment iteself can create the NAE. It produces nanoparticles > on wires subjected to glow discharge for about 3 days. He has SEM photos > and excess heat results showing this.**** > > ** ** > > Mizuno himself cannot attend.**** > > ** ** > > - Jed**** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
