Mark, Eric

In the absence of an expert, let me agree with Mark that tunneling through a
nucleus occurs regularly on the nanoscale and lower geometry levels, and
furthermore could be instrumental in understanding LENR. 

However, tunneling does not occur with a single proton. In fact, constant
tunneling is as natural as any electron orbital state in some atoms (P-block
which excluded the hydrogen atom but not the H2 molecule) where tunneling is
a regular feature, which of course the p-orbital. Essentially this
represents a constant state of tunneling through a nucleus (as I understand
it, but consult an expert if you doubt this assertion). 

Consider the “hour glass” p-orbital in an atom or molecule as electrons
continually crossing from one lobe to the other by way of another dimension.
Apparently, the electron can never exist in the nodal area itself which is
where the nucleus should be - instead the electrons travel must through via
another spatial dimension which can be called reciprocal or imaginary space
- and which is another good reason to suspect there are at least 4 spatial
dimensions. 

As far as LENR is concerned, the hydrogen atom has no p-orbital but the
hydrogen molecule does, and this implies that the 2p H2 molecule will be
more active – in fact FAR MORE ACTIVE FOR LENR – at least in Ni-H when
coupling to a polariton happens in a way that promotes the “bonding” (fusion
or reversible fusion) of the two protons. See this wavefunction image for
H2:

http://img.sparknotes.com/figures/8/83ce1fb7be648ede5785ea60c96b495c/wavefun
.gif

Of course a bare proton can couple to a polariton, but it requires enormous
effective temperature not found in LENR. This could be an important piece of
the puzzle. The hourglass p-orbital of molecular hydrogen, being a dipole
can readily couple to a polariton formed from IR photons interacting with
phonons in a Casimir surface pit - whereas atomic hydrogen cannot. 

This effectively negates much of Mills theory in favor of a methodology for
reducing the molecular p orbitals simultaneously in one step - so that a
redundant ground state of the bound pair happens with the p-orbital intact
(it can be transitory). As a result, this step uses the polariton to boost
the effective charge of the incoming p-orbital in order to bring two protons
much close together ! And all this WITHOUT the “orbitsphere” fiction of
Mills. That’s a relief, since this way we can find hydrogen densification
without recourse to Mills.

This redundant (densified) p-orbital in H2 is both energetic in its own
right, and is the perfect setup for RPF – reversible proton fusion.

As a refinement to an emerging theory that is more applicable to the Rossi
HotCat than anything else in LENR - if the two approaching protons have
emitted EUV or a soft x-ray during the densification step, then the RPF
reaction can serve to harness QCD in such a way that the zero point field
actually provides the makeup energy, which has been expended during the
prior emission. 

Very elegant, if I do say so myself – with major thanks to Mark for bringing
in the p-orbital connection (even if he was not thinking specifically of
polariton coupling at the time, or maybe he was).

                From: MarkI-ZeroPoint 
                
                Eric,
                the reason the ‘tunneling’ electron doesn’t interact is
because it is no longer at a different pressure; it is traversing the
nucleus as a ‘flow’.  That flow polarizes the surrounding vacuum, the
polarization forming a barrier which impedes the flow, thus causing a
build-up of ‘pressure’, and a equal and opposite reduction in pressure on
the opposite end of the oscillations extent.  In trying to visualize the p+x
side of the oscillation, think of a balloon inflating.  The physical balloon
though is replaced by a growing polarized surrounding vacuum… all this
obviously happening at extremely fast speeds (10^-15 sec). 

                I don’t know if it’s accurate to say that the tunneling
electron doesn’t ‘interact’ with the substance within the nucleus… I would
bet that it does indeed; that there is some kind of coupling or attractive
forces between them, and this is what keeps the electron oscillations with
*that* nucleus and not separating from it to go wandering, or flying, off… 

                There are harmonics at play between the electron
oscillations and the nuclear ones, and you have to add enough energy before
the e- oscillation jumps to a larger physical extent… add enough E to the
oscillation and it exceeds the coupling with the nuclear oscillations and
the e- escapes, (ionization energy).

                Can you think of any other observational phenomena which a
dipolar model explains???

                -Mark

                From: Eric Walker 
                - electrons tunneling ‘thru’ the nucleus
                
                That's a weird one.  When I first read about that one, it
seemed a little off to me.  There's this super dense quark-gluon plasma with
all this energy, and the electron flies through the sea quarks without
interacting with them (much).  Maybe I've misunderstood the situation.
                
                Eric
                

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to